The consequences of competition: simulating the effects of research grant allocation strategies (2016)
Type of ContentJournal Article
© 2016, Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest, Hungary. Researchers have to operate in an increasingly competitive environment in which funding is becoming a scarce resource. Funding agencies are unable to experiment with their allocation policies since even small changes can have dramatic effects on academia. We present a Proposal-Evaluation-Grant System (PEGS) which allows us to simulate different research funding allocation policies. We implemented four Resource Allocation Strategies (RAS) entitled Communism, Lottery, Realistic, and Ideal. The results show that there is a strong effect of the RAS on the careers of the researchers. In addition the PEGS investigated the influence of the paper writing skill and the grant review errors.
CitationHöylä T, Bartneck C, Tiihonen T (2016). The consequences of competition: simulating the effects of research grant allocation strategies. Scientometrics. 108(1). 263-288.
This citation is automatically generated and may be unreliable. Use as a guide only.
KeywordsScience & Technology; Technology; Computer Science, Interdisciplinary Applications; Information Science & Library Science; Computer Science; Funding; Allocation; Competition; Simulation; FACULTY; UNIVERSITY; INTENTION; IMPACT; LEAVE
ANZSRC Fields of Research44 - Human society::4407 - Policy and administration::440710 - Research, science and technology policy
39 - Education::3903 - Education systems::390303 - Higher education
46 - Information and computing sciences::4610 - Library and information studies::461005 - Informetrics
RightsAll rights reserved unless otherwise stated
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
Chang, C-L.; McAleer, M.; Oxley, L. (University of CanterburyUniversity of Canterbury. Department of Economics and Finance, 2013)This paper examines the issue of coercive journal self-citations and the practical usefulness of two recent journal performance metrics, namely the Eigenfactor score, which may be interpreted as measuring Journal Influence, ...
Reviewers’ scores do not predict impact: bibliometric analysis of the proceedings of the human–robot interaction conference Bartneck, Christoph (Springer Science and Business Media LLC, 2017)© 2016, Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest, Hungary. The peer review process is an essential component for the progress of science. The ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human–Robot Interaction is the prime publication channel ...
What Do Experts Know About Forecasting Journal Quality? A Comparison with ISI Research Impact in Finance Chang, C-L.; McAleer, M. (University of CanterburyUniversity of Canterbury. Department of Economics and Finance, 2013)Experts possess knowledge and information that are not publicly available. The paper is concerned with forecasting academic journal quality and research impact using a survey of international experts from a national project ...