On the Continuum Fallacy: Is Temperature a Continuous Function?

dc.contributor.authorMontelle, Clemency
dc.contributor.authorJha, Aditya
dc.contributor.authorCampbell, Douglas
dc.contributor.authorWilson, Phillip
dc.date.accessioned2023-11-21T00:49:01Z
dc.date.available2023-11-21T00:49:01Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.description.abstractIt is often argued that the indispensability of continuum models comes from their empirical adequacy despite their decoupling from the microscopic details of the modelled physical system. There is thus a commonly held misconception that temperature varying across a region of space or time can always be accurately represented as a continuous function. We discuss three inter-related cases of temperature modelling — in phase transitions, thermal boundary resistance and slip flows — and show that the continuum view is fallacious on the ground that the microscopic details of a physical system are not necessarily decoupled from continuum models. We show how temperature discontinuities are present in both data (experiments and simulations) and phenomena (theory and models) and how discontinuum models of temperature variation may have greater empirical adequacy and explanatory power. The conclusions of our paper are: a) continuum idealisations are not indispensable to modelling physical phenomena and both continuous and discontinuous representations of phenomena work depending on the context; b) temperature is not necessarily a continuously defined function in our best scientific representations of the world; and c) that its continuity, where applicable, is a contingent matter. We also raise a question as to whether discontinuous representations should be considered truly de-idealised descriptions of physical phenomena.
dc.identifier.citationMontelle C, Jha A, Campbell D, Wilson PL (2023). On the Continuum Fallacy: Is Temperature a Continuous Function?. Foundations of Physics: an international journal devoted to the conceptual and fundamental theories of modern physics, biophysics, and cosmology. 53(69). 1-29.
dc.identifier.doihttp://doi.org/10.1007/s10701-023-00713-x
dc.identifier.issn0015-9018
dc.identifier.issn1572-9516
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10092/106199
dc.languageen
dc.publisherSpringer Science and Business Media LLC
dc.rightsOpen Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http:// creat iveco mmons. org/ licen ses/ by/4. 0/.
dc.rights.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10092/17651
dc.subject.anzsrc49 - Mathematical sciences::4902 - Mathematical physics::490201 - Algebraic structures in mathematical physics
dc.titleOn the Continuum Fallacy: Is Temperature a Continuous Function?
dc.typeJournal Article
uc.collegeFaculty of Arts
uc.departmentMathematics and Statistics
uc.departmentHumanities
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Jha-Campbell-Montelle-Wilson-2023.pdf
Size:
1.51 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Published version
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
3.17 KB
Format:
Plain Text
Description: