False Dichotomies in Administrative Law: From There to Here

Simple item page
dc.contributor.authorJoseph PA
dc.date.accessioned2021-01-11T23:39:57Z
dc.date.available2021-01-11T23:39:57Z
dc.date.issued2016en
dc.date.updated2020-11-09T06:22:24Z
dc.description.abstractThis article critiques nine judicially-constructed dichotomies that dominated administrative law following the war. These dichotomies were fixed and unforgiving, portraying administrative law as rigorous and analytical. They lent respectability to a subject that naturally spawned suspicion. Senior judges denounced the subject as “Continental jargon” and the work of “academicians”. The irony is that the dichotomies employed to invigorate the subject were transparently false. They stultified administrative law reasoning and checked the courts’ ability to be effective purveyors of public accountability.en
dc.identifier.citationJoseph PA (2016). False Dichotomies in Administrative Law: From There to Here. New Zealand Law Review. [2016](1). 127-156.en
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10092/101447
dc.language.isoen
dc.rightsAll rights reserved unless otherwise stateden
dc.rights.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10092/17651en
dc.subject.anzsrcFields of Research::48 - Law and legal studies::4807 - Public law::480701 - Administrative lawen
dc.titleFalse Dichotomies in Administrative Law: From There to Hereen
dc.typeJournal Articleen
uc.collegeFaculty of Law
uc.departmentSchool of Law
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
ADMINISTRATIVE LAW STATE OF THE NATION paper December 2014.pdf
Size:
403.46 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Submitted version
Download
Collections
Law: Journal Articles