Physical and mental health outcomes following housing improvements: evidence from the GoWell study

Simple item page
dc.contributor.authorCurl, A.
dc.contributor.authorKearns, A.
dc.contributor.authorMason, P.
dc.contributor.authorEgan, M.
dc.contributor.authorTannahill, C.
dc.contributor.authorEllaway, A.
dc.date.accessioned2016-06-23T02:34:13Z
dc.date.available2016-06-23T02:34:13Z
dc.date.issued2015en
dc.description.abstractBackground Existing research points towards physical and mental health gains from housing improvements, but findings are inconsistent and often not statistically significant. The detailed characteristics and variability of housing improvement works are problematic and studies are often small, not experimental, with short follow-up times. Methods A quasi-experimental design was used to assess the impact on physical health and mental health (using SF-12v2 Physical and Mental health component summary scales) of four types of housing improvement works—central heating, ‘Secured By Design’ front doors, fabric works, kitchens and bathrooms—both singly and in pairwise combinations. A longitudinal sample of 1933 residents from 15 deprived communities in Glasgow, UK was constructed from surveys carried out in 2006, 2008 and 2011. Sociodemographic characteristics and changes in employment status were taken into account. Results Fabric works had positive associations with physical health (+2.09, 95% CI 0.13 to 4.04) and mental health (+1.84, 95% CI 0.04 to 3.65) in 1– 2 years. Kitchens and bathrooms had a positive association with mental health in 1–2 years (+2.58, 95% CI 0.79 to 4.36). Central heating had a negative association with physical health (−2.21, 95% CI −3.74 to −0.68). New front doors had a positive association with mental health in <1 year (+5.89, 95% CI 0.65 to 11.14) and when provided alongside kitchens and bathrooms (+4.25, 95% CI 1.71 to 6.80). Gaining employment had strong associations with physical health (+7.14, 95% CI 4.72 to 9.55) as well as mental health (+5.50, 95% CI 3.27 to 7.73). Conclusions Fabric works may provide insulation benefits and visual amenity benefits to residents. Front doors may provide important security benefits in deprived communities. Economic regeneration is important alongside property-led regeneration.en
dc.identifier.citationCurl, A., Kearns, A., Mason, P., Egan, M., Tannahill, C., Ellaway, A. (2015) Physical and mental health outcomes following housing improvements: Evidence from the GoWell study. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 69, pp. 12-19.en
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1136/jech-2014-204064
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10092/12352
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherUniversity of Canterbury. Geographyen
dc.rights.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10092/17651
dc.subject.anzsrcField of Research::16 - Studies in Human Society::1604 - Human Geographyen
dc.subject.anzsrcField of Research::11 - Medical and Health Sciences::1117 - Public Health and Health Servicesen
dc.titlePhysical and mental health outcomes following housing improvements: evidence from the GoWell studyen
dc.typeJournal Article
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
12659283_2015_Curl, Kearns, Mason, Egan, Tannahill & Ellaway JECH.pdf
Size:
651.97 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Download
Collections
Science: Journal Articles