Unpacking the efficacy of Reading to Learn using Cognitive Load Theory
dc.contributor.author | Millin T | |
dc.contributor.author | Mark M | |
dc.contributor.author | Pearce J | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-02-09T20:49:17Z | |
dc.date.available | 2021-02-09T20:49:17Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2020 | en |
dc.date.updated | 2021-01-12T01:01:58Z | |
dc.description.abstract | This paper synthesises the key findings of past separate studies conducted by the same authors, which sought to assess the efficacy of the Reading to Learn (RtL) literacy intervention on students' academic writing performance. Both studies of RtL were implemented in response to growing concerns about the academic under-preparedness of undergraduate students at universities across South Africa. The first study aimed to support mostly first-generation, first-year English Additional Language (EAL) learners in their transition to higher education. The second study aimed to support EAL students' academic writing development at a senior secondary school level prior to the school-to-university transition. In both studies, the cohorts of students examined originated from low socioeconomic communities, where linguistic marginalisation arguably imposes significant barriers to successful university completion. The novel contribution of this paper is to use a Cognitive Load Theoretical lens to explicate why RtL might improve the academic writing skills of under-prepared students making the transition to university. | en |
dc.identifier.citation | Millin T, Mark M, Pearce J (2020). Unpacking the efficacy of Reading to Learn using Cognitive Load Theory. Journal of Academic Language and Learning. 14(1). 113-126. | en |
dc.identifier.issn | 1835-5196 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/10092/101619 | |
dc.language.iso | en | |
dc.rights | All rights reserved unless otherwise stated | en |
dc.rights.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10092/17651 | en |
dc.subject | academic literacy | en |
dc.subject | scaffolding | en |
dc.subject | Cognitive Load Theory | en |
dc.subject | instructional design | en |
dc.subject | equity | en |
dc.subject.anzsrc | 1302 Curriculum and Pedagogy | en |
dc.subject.anzsrc | 1303 Specialist Studies in Education | en |
dc.subject.anzsrc | 2004 Linguistics | en |
dc.subject.anzsrc | Fields of Research::39 - Education::3901 - Curriculum and pedagogy::390104 - English and literacy curriculum and pedagogy (excl. LOTE, ESL and TESOL) | en |
dc.subject.anzsrc | Fields of Research::39 - Education::3904 - Specialist studies in education::390409 - Learning sciences | en |
dc.subject.anzsrc | Fields of Research::47 - Language, communication and culture::4704 - Linguistics::470401 - Applied linguistics and educational linguistics | en |
dc.subject.anzsrc | Fields of Research::39 - Education::3901 - Curriculum and pedagogy::390108 - LOTE, ESL and TESOL curriculum and pedagogy | en |
dc.title | Unpacking the efficacy of Reading to Learn using Cognitive Load Theory | en |
dc.type | Journal Article | en |
uc.college | Faculty of Education | |
uc.department | School of Teacher Education |
Files
Original bundle
1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
- Name:
- View of Unpacking the efficacy of Reading to Learn using Cognitive Load Theory.pdf
- Size:
- 4.17 MB
- Format:
- Adobe Portable Document Format
- Description:
- Published version