Why We Shouldn’t Reason Classically, and the Implications for Artificial Intelligence
| dc.contributor.author | Campbell, Douglas | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2022-09-23T04:34:52Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2022-09-23T04:34:52Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2016 | en |
| dc.date.updated | 2022-07-04T10:20:49Z | |
| dc.description.abstract | In this chapter I argue that human beings should reason, not in accordance with classical logic, but in accordance with a weaker ‘reticent logic’. I characterize reticent logic, and then show that arguments for the existence of fundamental Gödelian limitations on artificial intelligence are undermined by the idea that we should reason reticently, not classically. | en |
| dc.identifier.citation | Campbell D (2016). Why We Shouldn’t Reason Classically, and the Implications for Artificial Intelligence. In Synthese Library.: 151-165. Springer International Publishing. | en |
| dc.identifier.doi | http://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-23291-1_10 | |
| dc.identifier.isbn | 9783319232904 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/10092/104480 | |
| dc.language.iso | en | en |
| dc.publisher | Springer International Publishing | en |
| dc.rights | All rights reserved unless otherwise stated | en |
| dc.rights.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10092/17651 | en |
| dc.subject.anzsrc | Fields of Research::50 - Philosophy and religious studies::5003 - Philosophy | en |
| dc.title | Why We Shouldn’t Reason Classically, and the Implications for Artificial Intelligence | en |
| dc.type | Chapters | en |
| uc.college | Faculty of Arts | |
| uc.department | Humanities and Creative Arts |
Files
Original bundle
1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
- Name:
- Campbell2016-Reticent-Logic-Preprint.docx
- Size:
- 169.02 KB
- Format:
- Unknown data format
- Description:
- Submitted version