University of Canterbury Home
    • Admin
    UC Research Repository
    UC Library
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.
    View Item 
    1. UC Home
    2. Library
    3. UC Research Repository
    4. Faculty of Engineering | Te Kaupeka Pūhanga
    5. Engineering: Journal Articles
    6. View Item
    1. UC Home
    2.  > 
    3. Library
    4.  > 
    5. UC Research Repository
    6.  > 
    7. Faculty of Engineering | Te Kaupeka Pūhanga
    8.  > 
    9. Engineering: Journal Articles
    10.  > 
    11. View Item

    Laboratory comparison of odour control techniques for separated residential food waste (2008)

    Thumbnail
    View/Open
    12608610_Milke.pdf (269.3Kb)
    Type of Content
    Journal Article
    UC Permalink
    http://hdl.handle.net/10092/3558
    
    Publisher
    University of Canterbury. Civil and Natural Resources Engineering
    ISSN
    1754-5714
    Collections
    • Engineering: Journal Articles [1636]
    Authors
    Qamaruz-Zaman, N.
    Milke, M.W.
    show all
    Abstract

    With a moisture content of 75-85% and organic matter content over 80%, food residues can be a major source of odour during storage. A series of laboratory tests were conducted to compare odour control techniques for separated residential food waste under controlled conditions. A subjective odour intensity scale was used to monitor performance. The results indicate the importance of moisture absorption to control odours from food waste storage containers. Of the four additives considered, newspaper seemed to be the most effective because of its high moisture absorptive capacity and its ability to wrap the food wastes. Additives that would be expected to absorb or neutralise volatile, odour-causing compounds-- baking soda, EM Bokashi, and cat litter-- were not as effective, and neither was an additive that was expected to change the decomposition process and so change the odour production (EM Bokashi). Baking soda and EM Bokashi did not enhance water absorption when added to the waste. On the other hand, water absorption capability of cat litter varied depending on the placement method used and the form/size of the material.

    Citation
    Qamauz-Zaman, N., Milke, M.W. (2008) Laboratory comparison of odour control techniques for separated residential food waste. Communications in Waste and Resource Management, 9, pp. 18-24.
    This citation is automatically generated and may be unreliable. Use as a guide only.
    Keywords
    food waste; odour; baking soda; newspaper; EM Bokashi; cat litter
    Rights
    https://hdl.handle.net/10092/17651

    Related items

    Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.

    • VFA and ammonia from residential food waste as indicators of odor potential 

      Qamaruz-Zaman, N.; Milke, M.W. (University of Canterbury. Civil and Natural Resources Engineering, 2012)
      Research was conducted to determine suitable chemical parameters as indicators of odor from decomposing food wastes. Prepared food scraps were stored in 18 L plastic buckets (2 kg wet 3 weight each) at 20°C and 8°C to ...
    • Predicting the performance of a continuous anaerobic digester from batch-scale laboratory studies 

      Qamaruz-Zaman, N.; Milke, M. (University of Canterbury. Civil and Natural Resources Engineering, 2010)
      Evaluation of the suitability of food wastes for anaerobic digestion is made difficult because of variable and uncertain degradation parameters. The purpose of the research was to examine the correspondence of first-order ...
    • Predicting Solid Waste Degradation Rates in Landfills Using an Improved Anaerobic Assessment Tool 

      Qamaruz-Zaman, N.; Milke, M. (University of Canterbury. Civil and Natural Resources Engineering, 2008)
    Advanced Search

    Browse

    All of the RepositoryCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThesis DisciplineThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThesis Discipline

    Statistics

    View Usage Statistics
    • SUBMISSIONS
    • Research Outputs
    • UC Theses
    • CONTACTS
    • Send Feedback
    • +64 3 369 3853
    • ucresearchrepository@canterbury.ac.nz
    • ABOUT
    • UC Research Repository Guide
    • Copyright and Disclaimer
    • SUBMISSIONS
    • Research Outputs
    • UC Theses
    • CONTACTS
    • Send Feedback
    • +64 3 369 3853
    • ucresearchrepository@canterbury.ac.nz
    • ABOUT
    • UC Research Repository Guide
    • Copyright and Disclaimer