Substantial differences in bias between signal-digest and double-digest RAD-seq libraries: A case study (2018)
The tradeoffs of using single-digest versus double-digest restriction site associated DNA sequencing (RAD-seq) protocols have been widely discussed. However, no direct empirical comparisons of the two methods have been conducted. Here, we sampled a single population of Gulf pipefish (Syngnathus scovelli) and genotyped 444 individuals using RAD-seq. Sixty individuals were subjected to single-digest RAD-seq (sdRAD-seq), and the remaining 384 individuals were genotyped using a double-digest RAD-seq (ddRAD-seq) protocol. We analyzed the resulting Illumina sequencing data and compared the two genotyping methods when reads were analyzed either together or separately. Coverage statistics, observed heterozygosity, and allele frequencies differed significantly between the two protocols, as did the results of selection components analysis. We also performed an in silico digestion of the Gulf pipefish genome and modeled five major sources of bias: PCR duplicates, polymorphic restriction sites, shearing bias, asymmetric sampling (i.e., genotyping fewer individuals with sdRAD-seq than with ddRAD 26 seq), and higher major allele frequencies. This combination of approaches allowed us to determine that polymorphic restriction sites, an asymmetric sampling scheme, mean allele frequencies, and to some extent PCR duplicates all contribute to different estimates of allele frequencies between samples genotyped using sdRAD-seq versus ddRAD-seq. Our finding that sdRAD-seq and ddRAD-seq can result in different allele frequencies has implications for comparisons across studies and techniques that endeavor to identify genome-wide signatures of evolutionary processes in natural populations.
CitationFlanagan SP, Jones AG (2018). Substantial differences in bias between signal-digest and double-digest RAD-seq libraries: A case study. Molecular Ecology Resources. 18(2). 264-280.
This citation is automatically generated and may be unreliable. Use as a guide only.
Keywordsnext-generation sequencing; selection components analysis; Syngnathus scovelli; 10 allele dropout; PCR duplicates
ANZSRC Fields of Research31 - Biological sciences
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
Building strong relationships between conservation genetics and primary industry leads to mutually beneficial genomic advances. Galla SJ; Buckley TR; Elshire R; Hale ML; Knapp M; McCallum J; Moraga R; Santure AW; Wilcox P; Steeves TE (WILEY-BLACKWELL, 2016)Several reviews in the past decade have heralded the benefits of embracing high-throughput sequencing technologies to inform conservation policy and the management of threatened species, but few have offered practical ...
Flanagan SP; Jones AG (Wiley, 2019)© 2018 John Wiley & Sons Ltd Parentage analysis is a cornerstone of molecular ecology that has delivered fundamental insights into behaviour, ecology and evolution. Microsatellite markers have long been the king of ...
Selecting Candidates for De-extinction and Resurrection: Mammoths, Lenin’s Tomb and Neo-Eurasianism Mondry H (2017)My paper explores links between the human and animal candidates for resurrection and deextinction and focuses on the aspect of nationalist agenda in application to both species. I explore the intersection between the ...