The Inconceivable Popularity of Conceivability Arguments (2017)
View/ Open
Type of Content
Journal ArticlePublisher
Oxford University Press (OUP)ISSN
0031-80941467-9213
Language
enCollections
- Arts: Journal Articles [314]
Abstract
Famous examples of conceivability arguments include (i) Descartes’ argument for mind-body dualism, (ii) Kripke's ‘modal argument’ against psychophysical identity theory, (iii) Chalmers’ ‘zombie argument’ against materialism, and (iv) modal versions of the ontological argument for theism. In this paper, we show that for any such conceivability argument, C, there is a corresponding ‘mirror argument’, M. M is deductively valid and has a conclusion that contradicts C’s conclusion. Hence, a proponent of C—henceforth, a ‘conceivabilist’—can be warranted in holding that C’s premises are conjointly true only if she can find fault with one of M’s premises. But M’s premises are modelled on a pair of C’s premises. The same reasoning that supports the latter supports the former. For this reason, a conceivabilist can repudiate M’s premises only on pain of severely undermining C’s premises. We conclude on this basis that all conceivability arguments, including each of (i)–(iv), are fallacious.
Citation
Campbell D, Copeland BJ, Deng Z (2017). The Inconceivable Popularity of Conceivability Arguments. The Philosophical Quarterly. 67(267). 223-240.This citation is automatically generated and may be unreliable. Use as a guide only.
Keywords
conceivability argument; modal argument; zombie argument; ontological argument; physicalismANZSRC Fields of Research
50 - Philosophy and religious studies::5003 - PhilosophyRights
All rights reserved unless otherwise statedRelated items
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
-
On the Authenticity of De-extinct Organisms, and the Genesis Argument
Campbell, Douglas (2017)Are the methods of synthetic biology capable of recreating authentic living members of an extinct species? An analogy with the restoration of destroyed natural landscapes suggests not. e restored version of a natural ... -
Does the solar system compute the laws of motion?
Yang Y; Campbell, Douglas (Springer Science and Business Media LLC, 2021)The counterfactual account of physical computation is simple and, for the most part, very attractive. However, it is usually thought to trivialize the notion of physical computation insofar as it implies ‘limited ... -
Against Lewis on ‘Desire as Belief’
Campbell DI (2017)David Lewis describes, then attempts to refute, a simple anti-Humean theory of desire he calls ‘Desire as Belief’. Lewis’ critics generally accept that his argument is sound and focus instead on trying to show that its ...