Who Pays for a Managed Retreat? Lessons from the Christchurch Residential Red Zone
| dc.contributor.author | Noy, Ilan | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2018-09-13T20:18:44Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2018-09-13T20:18:44Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2018 | en |
| dc.description.abstract | After the Christchurch earthquakes, the government declared about 8000 houses as Red Zoned, prohibiting further developments in these properties, and offering the owners to buy them out. The government provided two options for owners: the first was full payment for both land and dwelling at the 2007 property evaluation, the second was payment for land, and the rest to be paid by the owner’s insurance. Most people chose the second option. Using data from LINZ combined with data from StatNZ, this project empirically investigates what led people to choose this second option, and what were the implications of these choices for the owners’ wealth and income. | en |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10092/16003 | |
| dc.language.iso | en | |
| dc.rights | CC-BY 4.0 International | en |
| dc.rights.uri | https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode | |
| dc.title | Who Pays for a Managed Retreat? Lessons from the Christchurch Residential Red Zone | en |
| dc.type | Conference Contributions - Other | en |
Files
Original bundle
1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
- Name:
- POSTER - Noy_Who Pays for a Managed Retreat.pdf
- Size:
- 775.68 KB
- Format:
- Adobe Portable Document Format
- Description:
License bundle
1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
- Name:
- license.txt
- Size:
- 1.71 KB
- Format:
- Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
- Description: