Optimizing Instantaneous and Ramping Reserves with Different Response Speeds for Contingencies—Part II: Implications
dc.contributor.author | Schipper, Josh | |
dc.contributor.author | Wood, Alan | |
dc.contributor.author | Edwards, Conrad | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2020-06-17T03:20:51Z | |
dc.date.available | 2020-06-17T03:20:51Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2020 | en |
dc.date.updated | 2020-05-01T01:01:32Z | |
dc.description.abstract | Part I presents a formulation to optimize reserves for contingent events while explicitly including their response times. Part II highlights the implications of using this formulation in a reserves market. There are four aspects of the formulation that are of interest: (1) the performance of the solver, (2) the importance of inertia and contingency size. These implications are highlighted through two examples. (3) The proposed formulation is compared against a reserve optimization which does not distinguish between different response speeds, but adjusts the reserve requirement to satisfy the same frequency limits. Differentiating between response speeds within the optimization can provide a 23% reduction in total reserve requirement on average, which improves to a reduction of 52% in low inertia conditions. (4) A marginal pricing methodology is developed which prices reserve in a market context, and gives a unique price to each reserve provider depending on response speed. This gives incentive for reserve providers to improve response speed. | en |
dc.identifier.citation | Schipper J, Wood A, Edwards C (2020). Optimizing Instantaneous and Ramping Reserves with Different Response Speeds for Contingencies—Part II: Implications. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems. 1-1. | en |
dc.identifier.doi | https://doi.org/10.1109/tpwrs.2020.2984702 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 0885-8950 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 1558-0679 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/10092/100638 | |
dc.language.iso | en | |
dc.publisher | Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) | en |
dc.rights | All rights reserved unless otherwise stated | en |
dc.rights.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10092/17651 | en |
dc.subject | Reserve Markets | en |
dc.subject | Primary Frequency Control Reserve | en |
dc.subject | Contingency Reserve | en |
dc.subject | Quadratically Constrained Programming | en |
dc.subject | Convex Optimization | en |
dc.subject.anzsrc | Field of Research::09 - Engineering::0906 - Electrical and Electronic Engineering::090608 - Renewable Power and Energy Systems Engineering (excl. Solar Cells) | en |
dc.subject.anzsrc | Field of Research::09 - Engineering::0906 - Electrical and Electronic Engineering::090607 - Power and Energy Systems Engineering (excl. Renewable Power) | en |
dc.title | Optimizing Instantaneous and Ramping Reserves with Different Response Speeds for Contingencies—Part II: Implications | en |
dc.type | Journal Article | en |
uc.college | Faculty of Engineering | |
uc.department | Electrical and Computer Engineering | |
uc.department | Electric Power Engineering Centre |
Files
Original bundle
1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
- Name:
- FINAL_VERSION.pdf
- Size:
- 2.01 MB
- Format:
- Adobe Portable Document Format
- Description:
- Accepted version