Libya and the Politics of the Responsibility to Protect

Simple item page
dc.contributor.authorMoses, J.
dc.date.accessioned2014-11-11T22:28:49Z
dc.date.available2014-11-11T22:28:49Z
dc.date.issued2013en
dc.description.abstractThe Responsibility to Protect (RtoP) norm is usually framed in apolitical terms of civilian protection. This paper aims to challenge that depiction and demonstrate the deeply political nature of the RtoP, which is often elided or denied by its proponents. In order to achieve this, the paper will first look to the RtoP literature to demonstrate the depoliticisation of the norm, evident in the reference to the 'international community' or the 'conscience of mankind' as decisive factors in determining when the responsibility to protect has been breached and what should be done to rectify the situation. I will then turn to a case study of the 2011 NATO intervention in Libya. In this situation, the initial calls for intervention were premised upon the protection of civilian life against the murderous intent of the Gaddafi regime. The NATO action that followed the initial UN authorization, however, went far beyond the authority to protect civilians and strayed into the highly political realm of regime change, to the extent that the intervening forces became heavy participants in the forced displacement and massacre that occurred during the siege of Sirte. Taking sides, in this case, meant deciding who represented good and evil participating in violence against civilians of a similar nature to that which called forth the intervention in the first place. This example will be used to demonstrate the inevitable 'fall' into politics - and a profoundly 'sovereign' politics at that - that will accompany any physical attempt to protect civilians in the context of a civil war.en
dc.identifier.citationMoses, J. (2013) Libya and the Politics of the Responsibility to Protect. San Francisco, CA, USA: International Studies Association Annual Convention (ISA 2013), 3-6 Apr 2013.en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10092/9845
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherUniversity of Canterbury. School of Language, Social and Political Sciencesen
dc.publisherUniversity of Canterbury. Political Scienceen
dc.rights.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10092/17651en
dc.subject.anzsrcFields of Research::44 - Human society::4408 - Political science::440808 - International relationsen
dc.titleLibya and the Politics of the Responsibility to Protecten
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
12644728_Moses - Good Evil Libya ISA 2013.pdf
Size:
900.87 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Download
Collections
Arts: Conference Contributions