Ground motion selection for simulation-based seismic hazard and structural reliability assessment

dc.contributor.authorBradley, Brendon
dc.contributor.authorBurks, Lynne S.
dc.contributor.authorBaker, Jack W.
dc.date.accessioned2015-09-21T21:13:40Z
dc.date.available2015-09-21T21:13:40Z
dc.date.issued2015en
dc.description.abstractThis paper examines four methods by which ground motions can be selected for dynamic seismic response analyses of engineered systems when the underlying seismic hazard is quantified via ground motion simulation rather than empirical ground motion prediction equations. Even with simulation-based seismic hazard, a ground motion selection process is still required in order to extract a small number of time series from the much larger set developed as part of the hazard calculation. Four specific methods are presented for ground motion selection from simulation-based seismic hazard analyses, and pros and cons of each are discussed via a simple and reproducible illustrative example. One of the four methods (method 1 ‘direct analysis’) provides a ‘benchmark’ result (i.e. using all simulated ground motions), enabling the consistency of the other three more efficient selection methods to be addressed. Method 2 (‘stratified sampling’) is a relatively simple way to achieve a significant reduction in the number of ground motions required through selecting subsets of ground motions binned based on an intensity measure, IM. Method 3 (‘simple multiple stripes’) has the benefit of being consistent with conventional seismic assessment practice using as-recorded ground motions, but both methods 2 and 3 are strongly dependent on the efficiency of the conditioning IM to predict the seismic responses of interest. Method 4 (‘GCIM-based selection’) is consistent with ‘advanced’ selection methods used for as-recorded ground motions, and selects subsets of ground motions based on multiple IMs, thus overcoming this limitation in methods 2 and 3.en
dc.identifier.citationBradley BA, Burks LS, Baker JW (2015) Ground motion selection for simulation-based seismic hazard and structural reliability assessment. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 44(13), pp. 2321-2340.en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10092/10919
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherUniversity of Canterbury. Civil and Natural Resources Engineeringen
dc.rights.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10092/17651en
dc.subjectground motion selectionen
dc.subjectseismic hazard analysisen
dc.subjectground motion simulationen
dc.subject.anzsrcField of Research::04 - Earth Sciences::0403 - Geology::040313 - Tectonicsen
dc.subject.anzsrcFields of Research::40 - Engineering::4005 - Civil engineering::400506 - Earthquake engineeringen
dc.titleGround motion selection for simulation-based seismic hazard and structural reliability assessmenten
dc.typeJournal Article
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
12657593_Bradley_GmSelectionforSimulationBasedSha_accepted.pdf
Size:
13.01 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format