Motivations, barriers, and strategies for meat reduction at different family lifecycle stages

dc.contributor.authorKemper, Joya A.
dc.date.accessioned2023-07-26T03:18:53Z
dc.date.available2023-07-26T03:18:53Z
dc.date.issued2020en
dc.date.updated2022-10-09T22:21:37Z
dc.description.abstractThe consumption of animal products, especially meat, contributes heavily to climate change. Despite an increased number of individuals reducing their meat consumption, little research has explored flexitarianism. The objective of this study was to explore the motivations, barriers, and strategies for reduced meat consumption. The qualitative study, utilizing six focus groups in New Zealand, explores the cognitive, affective, and cultural components of meat reduction through the examination of the different stages of the family lifecycle. The research finds significant differences in motivations for meat reduction between young adults, families, and retirees, with health, environmental and cost important factors but to different degrees. However, all continue to eat meat due to cravings, taste and nutrition beliefs. Strategies for substitution are similar for young adults and families but differ from retirees, with the former populations exhibiting greater creativity and exploration, not seeing meat reduction as ‘meat replacement’ but instead as a recreation of the main meal. The barriers to meat reduction are similar across the family lifecycle with a lack of information and cultural, media, and institutional discourse large inhibitors to reduction. Yet, social and cultural factors also encourage individuals to reflect on their meat consumption and social connections (including social media) provide accessible and persuasive messaging for meat reduction. Consequently, public education and social marketing campaigns need to be implemented to provide information and recipes, and such information should be in varied formats to appeal to different consumer segments.en
dc.identifier.citationKemper JA (2020). Motivations, barriers, and strategies for meat reduction at different family lifecycle stages. Appetite. 150. 104644-.en
dc.identifier.doihttp://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2020.104644
dc.identifier.issn0195-6663
dc.identifier.issn1095-8304
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10092/105768
dc.languageeng
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherElsevier BVen
dc.rightsAll rights reserved unless otherwise stateden
dc.rights.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10092/17651en
dc.subjectHumansen
dc.subjectDieten
dc.subjectFocus Groupsen
dc.subjectFeeding Behavioren
dc.subjectSocial Behavioren
dc.subjectMotivationen
dc.subjectFamilyen
dc.subjectQualitative Researchen
dc.subjectCultureen
dc.subjectMeaten
dc.subjectAdulten
dc.subjectAgeden
dc.subjectMiddle Ageden
dc.subjectNew Zealanden
dc.subjectFemaleen
dc.subjectMaleen
dc.subjectYoung Adulten
dc.subjectConsumer Behavioren
dc.subject.anzsrcFields of Research::47 - Language, communication and culture::4702 - Cultural studies::470205 - Cultural studies of agriculture, food and wineen
dc.subject.anzsrcFields of Research::47 - Language, communication and culture::4702 - Cultural studies::470209 - Environment and cultureen
dc.subject.anzsrcFields of Research::52 - Psychologyen
dc.subject.anzsrcFields of Research::44 - Human society::4410 - Sociologyen
dc.titleMotivations, barriers, and strategies for meat reduction at different family lifecycle stagesen
dc.typeJournal Articleen
uc.collegeUC Business School
uc.departmentManagement, Marketing and Entrepreneurship
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Kemper_2020.pdf
Size:
121.52 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Accepted version