Model-based PEEP titration versus standard practice in mechanical ventilation: A randomised controlled trial

Simple item page
dc.contributor.authorKim KT
dc.contributor.authorMorton S
dc.contributor.authorHowe S
dc.contributor.authorChiew YS
dc.contributor.authorDesaive T
dc.contributor.authorBenyo B
dc.contributor.authorSzlavecz A
dc.contributor.authorMoeller K
dc.contributor.authorShaw, Geoff
dc.contributor.authorKnopp, Jennifer
dc.contributor.authorDocherty, Paul
dc.contributor.authorPretty, Christopher
dc.contributor.authorChase, Geoff
dc.date.accessioned2021-06-15T04:55:42Z
dc.date.available2021-06-15T04:55:42Z
dc.date.issued2020en
dc.date.updated2021-04-19T03:19:35Z
dc.description.abstractBackground: Positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) at minimum respiratory elastance during mechanical ventilation (MV) in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) may improve patient care and outcome. The Clinical utilisation of respiratory elastance (CURE) trial is a two-arm, randomised controlled trial (RCT) investigating the performance of PEEP selected at an objective, model-based minimal respiratory system elastance in patients with ARDS. Methods and design: The CURE RCT compares two groups of patients requiring invasive MV with a partial pressure of arterial oxygen/fraction of inspired oxygen (PaO2/FiO2) ratio ≤ 200; one criterion of the Berlin consensus definition of moderate (≤ 200) or severe (≤ 100) ARDS. All patients are ventilated using pressure controlled (bi-level) ventilation with tidal volume = 6-8 ml/kg. Patients randomised to the control group will have PEEP selected per standard practice (SPV). Patients randomised to the intervention will have PEEP selected based on a minimal elastance using a model-based computerised method. The CURE RCT is a single-centre trial in the intensive care unit (ICU) of Christchurch hospital, New Zealand, with a target sample size of 320 patients over a maximum of 3 years. The primary outcome is the area under the curve (AUC) ratio of arterial blood oxygenation to the fraction of inspired oxygen over time. Secondary outcomes include length of time of MV, ventilator-free days (VFD) up to 28 days, ICU and hospital length of stay, AUC of oxygen saturation (SpO )/FiO during MV, number of desaturation events (SpO < 88%), changes in respiratory mechanics and chest x-ray index scores, rescue therapies (prone positioning, nitric oxide use, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation) and hospital and 90-day mortality. Discussion: The CURE RCT is the first trial comparing significant clinical outcomes in patients with ARDS in whom PEEP is selected at minimum elastance using an objective model-based method able to quantify and consider both inter-patient and intra-patient variability. CURE aims to demonstrate the hypothesized benefit of patient-specific PEEP and attest to the significance of real-time monitoring and decision-support for MV in the critical care environment. Trial registration: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trial Registry, ACTRN12614001069640. Registered on 22 September 2014. (https://www.anzctr.org.au/Trial/Registration/TrialReview.aspx?id=366838&isReview=true) The CURE RCT clinical protocol and data usage has been granted by the New Zealand South Regional Ethics Committee (Reference number: 14/STH/132). 2 2 2en
dc.identifier.citationKim KT, Morton S, Howe S, Chiew YS, Knopp JL, Docherty P, Pretty C, Desaive T, Benyo B, Szlavecz A, Moeller K, Shaw GM, Chase JG (2020). Model-based PEEP titration versus standard practice in mechanical ventilation: A randomised controlled trial. Trials. 21(1). 130-.en
dc.identifier.doihttp://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-019-4035-7
dc.identifier.issn1745-6215
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10092/102041
dc.languageeng
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherSpringer Science and Business Media LLCen
dc.rightsAll rights reserved unless otherwise stateden
dc.rights.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10092/17651en
dc.subjectRespiratory Systemen
dc.subjectHumansen
dc.subjectRespiratory Distress Syndrome, Adulten
dc.subjectOxygenen
dc.subjectBreath Testsen
dc.subjectRespiration, Artificialen
dc.subjectPositive-Pressure Respirationen
dc.subjectOxygen Consumptionen
dc.subjectComputer-Aided Designen
dc.subjectMiddle Ageden
dc.subjectFemaleen
dc.subjectMaleen
dc.subjectRandomized Controlled Trials as Topicen
dc.subjectClinical Trials, Phase II as Topicen
dc.subjectVentilator-Induced Lung Injuryen
dc.subjectOutcome Assessment, Health Careen
dc.subjectARDSen
dc.subjectmechanical ventilationen
dc.subjectpulmonary mechanicsen
dc.subjectRCTen
dc.subjectPEEP titrationen
dc.subject.anzsrc1102 Cardiorespiratory Medicine and Haematologyen
dc.subject.anzsrc1103 Clinical Sciencesen
dc.subject.anzsrcFields of Research::32 - Biomedical and clinical sciences::3202 - Clinical sciences::320212 - Intensive careen
dc.subject.anzsrcFields of Research::32 - Biomedical and clinical sciences::3201 - Cardiovascular medicine and haematology::320103 - Respiratory diseasesen
dc.subject.anzsrcFields of Research::40 - Engineering::4003 - Biomedical engineering::400306 - Computational physiologyen
dc.titleModel-based PEEP titration versus standard practice in mechanical ventilation: A randomised controlled trialen
dc.title.alternativeModel based PEEP titration versus standard practice in mechanical ventilation: A randomised controlled trialen
dc.typeJournal Articleen
uc.collegeFaculty of Engineering
uc.departmentMechanical Engineering
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Model-based PEEP titration versus standard practice in mechanical ventilation a randomised controlled trial.pdf
Size:
1.11 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Download
Collections
Engineering: Journal Articles