University of Canterbury Home
    • Admin
    UC Research Repository
    UC Library
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.
    View Item 
    1. UC Home
    2. Library
    3. UC Research Repository
    4. UC Business School | Te Kura Umanga
    5. Business: Conference Contributions
    6. View Item
    1. UC Home
    2.  > 
    3. Library
    4.  > 
    5. UC Research Repository
    6.  > 
    7. UC Business School | Te Kura Umanga
    8.  > 
    9. Business: Conference Contributions
    10.  > 
    11. View Item

    Remuneration Logics: How Large U.S. Firms Justify Ceo Pay (2010)

    Thumbnail
    View/Open
    12626073_RemunerationLogics-AFAANZ.pdf (298.7Kb)
    UC Permalink
    http://hdl.handle.net/10092/4734
    
    Publisher
    University of Canterbury. Department of Accounting and Information Systems
    Related resource(s)
    http://www.afaanz.org/openconf-afaanz2010/modules/request.php?module=oc_program&action=view.php&id=352
    Collections
    • Business: Conference Contributions [242]
    Authors
    Crombie, N.A.
    Alam, S.
    Tan, V.
    show all
    Abstract

    Purpose: The legitimacy of CEO pay in large U.S. firms has been repeatedly challenged in first decade of the 21st century. However, increases in CEO pay have continued to outpace corresponding changes in firm size and performance. This paper studies how large U.S. firms employ remuneration logics to legitimise CEO pay. Design/methodology/approach: Content analysis is used to identify 13 remuneration logics used in the 1998 and 2007 proxy statements from the largest 50 U.S. firms as well as 18 codes of practice issued between 1994 and 2007. Findings: The remuneration policies of U.S. firms have become increasingly homogenous over time. In 2007, all firms studied used the human resources, market and pay-for-performance logics to justify CEO pay. While firms use the remuneration logics to strategically manage their legitimacy, coercive and normative pressures are driving firms towards uniformity in their remuneration policies. Originality/value: Legitimacy and institutional theory are used to understand and explain organisational discourse on executive remuneration.

    Citation
    Crombie, N.A., Alam, S., Tan, V. (2010) Remuneration Logics: How Large U.S. Firms Justify Ceo Pay. Christchurch, New Zealand: 2010 AFAANZ Conference, 4-6 Jul 2010.
    This citation is automatically generated and may be unreliable. Use as a guide only.
    Keywords
    corporate governance; executive remuneration; legitimacy theory; institutional theory
    ANZSRC Fields of Research
    14 - Economics::1402 - Applied Economics::140211 - Labour Economics
    15 - Commerce, Management, Tourism and Services::1503 - Business and Management::150303 - Corporate Governance and Stakeholder Engagement
    Rights
    https://hdl.handle.net/10092/17651

    Related items

    Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.

    • An Institutional Logics Perspective on Executive Remuneration in Anglo-Saxon Countries 

      Crombie, N.A. (University of Canterbury. Department of Accounting and Information Systems, 2013)
      Purpose: Corporate Logic and Investor Logic are the two dominant institutional logics of corporate governance in Anglo-Saxon countries (Lok, 2010; Zajac and Westphal, 2004). Corporate Logic portrays executives as trustworthy ...
    • Executive remuneration principles, practices and processes: an institutional logics perspective 

      Crombie, N.A. (Inderscience Enterprises LtdUniversity of Canterbury. Department of Accounting and Information Systems, 2015)
      Agency logic assumes that executives are greedy and opportunistic, which implies that monetary incentives are necessary to ensure they act in the best interests of shareholders; whereas corporate logic assumes that executives ...
    • The Legitimacy of CEO Pay: The Discourse of Telecom, the Media and the Public 

      Tan, V.; Crombie, N.A. (University of Canterbury. Department of Accounting and Information Systems, 2011)
      This paper investigates how Telecom Corporation of New Zealand Ltd (Telecom) managed its legitimacy after announcing the Chief Executive Officer’s (CEO’s) pay in 2009 as well as the media’s and public’s reaction to Telecom’s ...
    Advanced Search

    Browse

    All of the RepositoryCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThesis DisciplineThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThesis Discipline

    Statistics

    View Usage Statistics
    • SUBMISSIONS
    • Research Outputs
    • UC Theses
    • CONTACTS
    • Send Feedback
    • +64 3 369 3853
    • ucresearchrepository@canterbury.ac.nz
    • ABOUT
    • UC Research Repository Guide
    • Copyright and Disclaimer
    • SUBMISSIONS
    • Research Outputs
    • UC Theses
    • CONTACTS
    • Send Feedback
    • +64 3 369 3853
    • ucresearchrepository@canterbury.ac.nz
    • ABOUT
    • UC Research Repository Guide
    • Copyright and Disclaimer