Political Polarization in Taiwan and the United States: A Research Puzzle (2019)
Type of ContentConference Contributions - Other
During the first two decades of the 21st century, the major political parties in both Taiwan (the Democratic Progressive Party or DPP and the Kuomintang or KMT) and the United States (Democrats and Republicans) became increasingly polarized in bitter political conflict. In Taiwan, this polarization centered on the strongly inter-linked issues of national identity and cross-Strait relations (Clark and Tan, 2012; Copper, 2016; Fell, 2005, 2018; Makeham and Hsiau, 2005; Rigger, 2011; Wachman, 1994), while in the U.S. the two major parties became polarized on a wide array of economic, cultural, and security issues (Abramowitz, 2010, 2011; Black and Black, 2007; Brewer and Stonecash, 2006; Brownstein, 2007; Layman, Carsey, Green, Herrera, and Cooperman, 2010; Stonecash, Brewer, and Mariani, 2003). In both countries, however, the sharp and vicious polarization of the political elites did not seemingly reflect a similar polarization in the electorate. This situation seemingly challenges the prominent Downsian theory that party positions should reflect the distribution of public opinion based on the assumption that the parties will seek to maximize their vote totals (Downs, 1957). This paper explores this seeming paradox. The first section sketches the basic theoretical model; the second provides an overview of the growing polarization in American and Taiwanese politics; and the third presents survey data from these two countries that cast considerable doubt on whether citizen public opinion is the driving force behind political polarization. The conclusion then seeks to adduce an explanation for why rational politicians would pursue policies that appear to be irrational for their presumed goals of maximizing electoral support and winning office and argues that the observed trends suggest that the “catch-all parties” that evolved during the post World War II era may be now deteriorating under new political conditions.
CitationClark C, Tan AC, Ho K (2019). Political Polarization in Taiwan and the United States: A Research Puzzle. Taipei, Taiwan: 2019 TIGCR International Conference on "Political Polarization: Perspectives go Governance and Communication". 25/10/2019-25/10/2019.
This citation is automatically generated and may be unreliable. Use as a guide only.
ANZSRC Fields of Research44 - Human society::4408 - Political science::440803 - Comparative government and politics
16 - Studies in Human Society::1606 - Political Science::160609 - Political Theory and Political Philosophy
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
A thematic exploration of three countries’ government communication during the COVID-19 crisis and corresponding media coverage Kenix LJ; Bolanos Lopez JF (Informa UK Limited, 2022)This study attempts to add to the current literature on crisis communication by exploring differences in COVID-19 governmental crisis communication and variances in the media coverage of that communication through thematic ...
The Uneasy Relationship Between National Security and Personal Freedom: New Zealand and the "War on Terror" Small, D. (University of Canterbury. School of Educational Studies and Human Development, 2011)As part of the ‘War on Terror’ declared in response to the 11 September 2001 attacks, countries introduced legislation to bolster national security, often at the expense of personal freedoms and long-established legal ...
Solving the collective action problem: New Zealand, Taiwan and the COVID-19 battle Tan A (2020)How have NZ and Taiwan been able to manage the COVID-19 crisis while others have done poorly? In this paper, I argue that the adroit pandemic crisis response and management of Taiwan and New Zealand can be attributed to ...