Cost-Effective Consideration Of Non-Structural Elements: Lessons From The Canterbury Earthquakes (2018)
By closely examining the performance of a 22-storey steel framed building in Christchurch subject to various earthquakes over the past seven years, it is shown that a number of lessons can be learnt regarding the cost-effective consideration of non-structural elements. The first point in this work is that non-structural elements significantly affected the costs associated with repairing steel eccentrically braced frame (EBF) links. The decommissioning or rerouting of non-structural elements in the vicinity of damaged links in the case study building attributed to approximately half the total cost of their repair. Such costs could be significantly reduced if the original positioning of non-structural elements took account of the potential need to repair the EBF links. The second point highlighted is the role that pre-cast cladding apparently played on the distribution and type of damage in the building. Loss estimates obtained following the FEMA P-58 framework vary considerably when cladding is or isnt modelled, both because of changes to drift demands up the height of the building and because certain types of subsequent damage are likely to be cheaper to repair than others. Finally, costly repairs to non-structural partition walls were required not only after the moment magnitude 7.1 earthquake in 2010 but also in multiple aftershocks in the years that followed. Repair costs associated with aftershock events exceeded those from the main event, emphasizing the need to consider aftershocks within modern performance-based earthquake engineering and also the opportunity that exists to make more cost-effective repair strategies following damaging earthquakes.
CitationSullivan T, Asisi FA, MacRae GA, Kurata M, Takeda T (2018). Cost-Effective Consideration Of Non-Structural Elements: Lessons From The Canterbury Earthquakes. Thessaloniki, Greece: 16th European Conference on Earthquake Engineering.
This citation is automatically generated and may be unreliable. Use as a guide only.
KeywordsNon-structural elements; seismic loss; repair and retrofit; Canterbury earthquakes
ANZSRC Fields of Research40 - Engineering::4005 - Civil engineering::400506 - Earthquake engineering
40 - Engineering::4005 - Civil engineering::400504 - Construction engineering
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
Takeda T; Asisi FA; Kurata M; Sullivan T; MacRae G (2018)Recent earthquakes have highlighted the vulnerability of nonstructural components. Nonstructural damage causes serious injuries and economic loss1) but current seismic design methodologies consider nonstructural damages ...
Yeow TZ; Orumiyehei A; Sullivan TJ; MacRae GA; Clifton GC; Elwood KJ (2018)© 2018 Springer Nature B.V. This study compares seismic losses considering initial construction costs and direct-repair costs for New Zealand steel moment-resisting frame buildings with friction connections and those with ...
Seismic design of acceleration-sensitive non-structural elements in New Zealand: State-of-practice and recommended changes Rashid M; Sullivan T; Dhakal, Rajesh (2021)Acceleration-sensitive non-structural elements not only constitute a significant portion of a building’s component inventory, but also comprise components and systems that are indispensable to the operational continuity ...