Biomedical engineer's guide to the clinical aspects of intensive care mechanical ventilation (2018)
BACKGROUND: Mechanical ventilation is an essential therapy to support critically ill respiratory failure patients. Current standards of care consist of generalised approaches, such as the use of positive end expiratory pressure to inspired oxygen fraction (PEEP-FiO2) tables, which fail to account for the inter- and intra-patient variability between and within patients. The benefits of higher or lower tidal volume, PEEP, and other settings are highly debated and no consensus has been reached. Moreover, clinicians implicitly account for patient-specific factors such as disease condition and progression as they manually titrate ventilator settings. Hence, care is highly variable and potentially often non-optimal. These conditions create a situation that could benefit greatly from an engineered approach. The overall goal is a review of ventilation that is accessible to both clinicians and engineers, to bridge the divide between the two fields and enable collaboration to improve patient care and outcomes. This review does not take the form of a typical systematic review. Instead, it defines the standard terminology and introduces key clinical and biomedical measurements before introducing the key clinical studies and their influence in clinical practice which in turn flows into the needs and requirements around how biomedical engineering research can play a role in improving care. Given the significant clinical research to date and its impact on this complex area of care, this review thus provides a tutorial introduction around the review of the state of the art relevant to a biomedical engineering perspective. DISCUSSION: This review presents the significant clinical aspects and variables of ventilation management, the potential risks associated with suboptimal ventilation management, and a review of the major recent attempts to improve ventilation in the context of these variables. The unique aspect of this review is a focus on these key elements relevant to engineering new approaches. In particular, the need for ventilation strategies which consider, and directly account for, the significant differences in patient condition, disease etiology, and progression within patients is demonstrated with the subsequent requirement for optimal ventilation strategies to titrate for patient- and time-specific conditions. CONCLUSION: Engineered, protective lung strategies that can directly account for and manage inter- and intra-patient variability thus offer great potential to improve both individual care, as well as cohort clinical outcomes.
KeywordsMechanical ventilation; Intensive care; Respiratory failure; Model-based treatment; Patient-specific ventilation; Protective lung strategies
ANZSRC Fields of Research32 - Biomedical and clinical sciences::3202 - Clinical sciences::320212 - Intensive care
40 - Engineering::4003 - Biomedical engineering::400303 - Biomechanical engineering
32 - Biomedical and clinical sciences::3201 - Cardiovascular medicine and haematology::320103 - Respiratory diseases
Rights© The Author(s) 2018. This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creat iveco mmons .org/licen ses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creat iveco mmons .org/publicdoma in/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
Redmond, D.P.; Docherty, P.D.; Chiew, Y.S.; Chase, Geoff (University of Canterbury. Mechanical Engineering, 2015)Patient breathing efforts occurring during controlled ventilation causes perturbations in pressure data, which cause erroneous parameter estimation in conventional models of respiratory mechanics. A polynomial model of ...
Why yesterday's care is now not good enough - an engineered approach to mechanical ventilation (Model-based elastance and optimal peep selection) Shaw, Geoff; Chiew, Y.S.; Chase, Geoff; Sundaresan, A.; Desaive, T. (University of Canterbury. Mechanical Engineering, 2013)
Chiew YS; Lambermont B; Morimont P; Shaw, Geoff; Desaive T; Chase, Geoff (Springer Science and Business Media LLC, 2020)