University of Canterbury Home
    • Admin
    UC Research Repository
    UC Library
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.
    View Item 
    1. UC Home
    2. Library
    3. UC Research Repository
    4. Faculty of Engineering | Te Kaupeka Pūhanga
    5. Engineering: Theses and Dissertations
    6. View Item
    1. UC Home
    2.  > 
    3. Library
    4.  > 
    5. UC Research Repository
    6.  > 
    7. Faculty of Engineering | Te Kaupeka Pūhanga
    8.  > 
    9. Engineering: Theses and Dissertations
    10.  > 
    11. View Item

    Selection and performance of ecosystem attributes for assessment of restoration success in biodiversity offset models (2017)

    Thumbnail
    View/Open
    Keye, Constanze_Final PhD Thesis.pdf (6.465Mb)
    Type of Content
    Theses / Dissertations
    UC Permalink
    http://hdl.handle.net/10092/14399
    http://dx.doi.org/10.26021/1268
    
    Thesis Discipline
    Forestry
    Degree Name
    Doctor of Philosophy
    Publisher
    University of Canterbury
    Language
    English
    Collections
    • Engineering: Theses and Dissertations [2762]
    Authors
    Keye, Constanze
    show all
    Abstract

    Biodiversity offsets are an international emerging impact assessment tool, attempting to bridge the gap between biodiversity conservation and sustainable economic development. Offsets shall compensate for unavoidable ecological damage after appropriate prevention and mitigation measures have been taken so that there is no net loss and ultimately a net gain for biodiversity near the impact site. Worldwide, ecologists are being challenged in choosing the most appropriate ecosystem attributes for use in biodiversity offset models. Attributes ought to represent the key biodiversity features at a given site, be quantifiable, easy to measure, reliable, and sensitive to management actions. However, biodiversity is complex and not easy to describe or measure, especially in the context of offsetting. Determining which attributes are the most appropriate for this task is currently compromised by the lack of a theoretical framework. To ensure that offsetting does result in genuine biodiversity retention, attribute choice has to be based on a sound scientific basis.

    To help establish such a foundation, this thesis first suggests a conceptual framework for attribute selection in forest ecosystems. Then ecosystem attributes commonly applied or suggested for the assessment of restoration success in forests are reviewed and a set that appears to be most suitable for application in biodiversity offsets is identified. Second, the performance of vegetation related attributes in terms of their predictability and information content are tested in a New Zealand restoration project using a chronosequence approach. Third, the surrogacy value of these vegetation measures for other species groups and ecosystem function is assessed. In particular, how well the recovery of aboveground attributes can predict the restoration of belowground attributes is assessed. This is critical, as typically the largest amount of site biodiversity occurs below-ground. Finally, a general set of attributes that will be applicable in most forest types is identified for biodiversity offset models. In addition, further recommendations for attribute selection within offsets models and how to manage uncertainty associated with them are given.

    Results of this thesis suggest that: (i) Structural elements such as basal area and mean diameter are the most predictable attributes, providing important information about the successional development of forests. (ii) Compositional measures can be less predictable but provide the highest information content. Predictability of these measures can be optimised if early to mid-successional stages are used as a restoration target and if restoration includes active management such as planting. (iii) Vegetation measures do not correlate well with the recovery of belowground species groups, but further research is necessary to confirm this. (iv) This research emphasises that the re-creation of old growth forest attributes can take several centuries when starting from early successional stages. It might be also surrounded by a high uncertainty in respect to compositional development; in particular, when passive reestablishment of vegetation is applied as a restoration tool. Therefore, achieving a no net loss of biodiversity as required by biodiversity offsets might, in many cases, be doubtful when offsetting for the loss of old growth forest habitats.

    Rights
    All Right Reserved
    https://canterbury.libguides.com/rights/theses

    Related items

    Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.

    • A comparison of three natural succession chronosequence case studies from the South Island, New Zealand to select predictable indices for evaluating restoration success 

      Mitchell, Robin A. (University of Canterbury. Forestry, 2005)
      Evaluating the success of ecological restoration interventions in establishing self-sustaining development toward distant goals within project timescales is problematic. Trajectory analysis is a promising evaluation strategy ...
    • Assessing the success of restoration plantings at Cape Foulwind, New Zealand 

      Phipps, Hilary Lee (University of Canterbury. Forestry, 2003)
      Holcim (New Zealand) Ltd. operate a quarry near Cape Foulwind, New Zealand Quarrying operations have a dramatic effect on the environment. Consequently, the company has developed a restoration strategy that aims to mitigate ...
    • The potential for biodiversity offsetting to fund effective invasive species control 

      Norton, D.A.; Warburton, B. (University of Canterbury. School of Forestry, 2015)
      Compensating for biodiversity losses in 1 location by conserving or restoring biodiversity elsewhere (i.e., biodiversity offsetting) is being used increasingly to compensate for biodiversity losses resulting from development. ...
    Advanced Search

    Browse

    All of the RepositoryCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThesis DisciplineThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThesis Discipline

    Statistics

    View Usage Statistics
    • SUBMISSIONS
    • Research Outputs
    • UC Theses
    • CONTACTS
    • Send Feedback
    • +64 3 369 3853
    • ucresearchrepository@canterbury.ac.nz
    • ABOUT
    • UC Research Repository Guide
    • Copyright and Disclaimer
    • SUBMISSIONS
    • Research Outputs
    • UC Theses
    • CONTACTS
    • Send Feedback
    • +64 3 369 3853
    • ucresearchrepository@canterbury.ac.nz
    • ABOUT
    • UC Research Repository Guide
    • Copyright and Disclaimer