Discretionary Trusts and Powers of Appointment: Progressive Assimilation

dc.contributor.author	Gravells, N.
dc.date.accessioned	2009-12-14T21:09:55Z
dc.date.available	2009-12-14T21:09:55Z
dc.date.issued	1992	en
dc.description.abstract	The distinction between trusts and powers as juridical concepts remains clear. However, during the second half of the twentieth century, the courts have been required to consider those concepts in the context of funds established for the benefit of employees and other large groups. The result has been that, although it is still possible to assert the conceptual distinction between trust and powers, the practical significance of that distinction has been progressively eroded. The purpose of this article is to examine these developments relating to the trust/power dichotomy, culminating in the recent decision in Mettoy Pension Trustees Ltd v Evans.	en
dc.identifier.citation	Gravells, N. (1992) Discretionary Trusts and Powers of Appointment: Progressive Assimilation. Canterbury Law Review, 5, pp. 67-83.	en
dc.identifier.uri	http://hdl.handle.net/10092/3253
dc.language.iso	en
dc.publisher	University of Canterbury. School of Law	en
dc.rights.uri	https://hdl.handle.net/10092/17651	en
dc.subject.marsden	Fields of Research::390000 Law, Justice and Law Enforcement::390100 Law::390120 Trust law	en
dc.title	Discretionary Trusts and Powers of Appointment: Progressive Assimilation	en
dc.type	Journal Article

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1