Glass Fibre Reinforced Polymer (GFRP) bars have been developed as an alternative to steel reinforcement for various structural concrete applications. Due to their non-corrossive nature, they are particularly suited for harsh environments where steel reinforcement is prone to corrosion. The purpose of this research is to determine the feasibility of GFRP reinforcing bars as concrete bridge deck reinforcement for locations, such as coastal New Zealand, where the non-corrosive benefits of GFRP may offer an alternative to traditional mild steel reinforcement. GFRP use as structural reinforcement may offer life-cycle cost benefits for certain structures as maintenance to repair corroded reinforcement is not necessary. The use of GFRP reinforcement in a New Zealand design context was investigated to directly compare the structural performance of this alternative reinforcing product. Mateen-bar, manufactured by Pultron Composites Ltd, is the GFRP reinforcing bar used in the experimental tests.
Experimental investigation of tensile properties of GFRP bar samples was carried out to understand the mechanical behaviour of GFRP reinforcement and validate the manufacturer’s specifications. This series of tests highlighted the complexities of carrying out tensile testing of FRP products, due to the inability to grip the GFRP directly in a testing machine without crushing the specimen. Two phases of full-scale tests were carried out to compare the performance of bridge deck slabs reinforced with typical mild steel and GFRP reinforcing bar. This experimental testing was different to most existing research on GFRP reinforced slab performance as it did not compare the performance of a GFRP reinforcing bar area equivalent to steel, but was designed in such a way as to dependably give the same moment capacity of the steel reinforced slab design. This incorporated the recommended limit of 20% of design stress given by the manufacturer which led to an apparent over-reinforced section for the GFRP slab design. The aim of the experiments was to investigate the comparative performance of a typical New Zealand bridge deck design and a GFRP reinforced equivalent designed in such a way as is currently recommended by the manufacturer. The over-reinforcement lead to differences in conclusions drawn by other authors who have studied GFRP reinforced slab behaviour. Both flexural and concentrated loading (simulating vehicle loading) tests were carried out on both the steel and GFRP reinforced slab designs. Due to over-reinforcement the GFRP slab was considerably stiffer and stronger than the steel design, indicating that serviceability issues are unlikely to be as much of a design issue as existing literature would suggest. Deflection prediction models generally underestimate the strength of over-reinforced sections. All slabs failed in punching shear under concentrated loads, indicating that punching shear may be a critical failure mechanism for GFRP reinforced slabs Based on the findings from the extensive experimental phases, a set of design recommendations were made to further improve the potential for GFRP to be used for bridge deck design in a New Zealand context.