Rousseau AFMinguet PColson CKellens IChaabane SDelanaye PCavalier ELambermont BMisset BChase, Geoff2022-08-172022-08-172021Rousseau AF, Minguet P, Colson C, Kellens I, Chaabane S, Delanaye P, Cavalier E, Chase JG, Lambermont B, Misset B (2021). Post-intensive care syndrome after a critical COVID-19: cohort study from a Belgian follow-up clinic. Annals of Intensive Care. 11(1). 118-.2110-5820https://hdl.handle.net/10092/104211Purpose: Many patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) required critical care. Mid-term outcomes of the survivors need to be assessed. The objective of this single-center cohort study was to describe their physical, cognitive, psychological, and biological outcomes at 3 months following intensive care unit (ICU)-discharge (M3). Patients and methods: All COVID-19 adults who survived an ICU stay ≥ 7 days and attended the M3 consultation at our multidisciplinary follow-up clinic were involved. They benefited from a standardized assessment, addressing health-related quality of life (EQ-5D-3L), sleep disorders (PSQI), and the three principal components of post-intensive care syndrome (PICS): physical status (Barthel index, handgrip and quadriceps strength), mental health disorders (HADS and IES-R), and cognitive impairment (MoCA). Biological parameters referred to C-reactive protein and creatinine. Results: Among the 92 patients admitted to our ICU for COVID-19, 42 survived a prolonged ICU stay and 32 (80%) attended the M3 follow-up visit. Their median age was 62 [49–68] years, 72% were male, and nearly half received inpatient rehabilitation following ICU discharge. At M3, 87.5% (28/32) had not regained their baseline level of daily activities. Only 6.2% (2/32) fully recovered, and had normal scores for the three MoCA, IES-R and Barthel scores. The main observed disorders were PSQI > 5 (75%, 24/32), MoCA < 26 (44%, 14/32), Barthel < 100 (31%, 10/32) and IES-R ≥ 33 (28%, 9/32). Combined disorders were observed in 13/32 (40.6%) of the patients. The EQ-5D-3L visual scale was rated at 71 [61–80]. A quarter of patients (8/32) demonstrated a persistent inflammation based on CRP blood level (9.3 [6.8–17.7] mg/L). Conclusion: The burden of severe COVID-19 and prolonged ICU stay was considerable in the present cohort after 3 months, affecting both functional status and biological parameters. These data are an argument on the need for closed follow-up for critically ill COVID-19 survivors.en© The Author(s) 2021. Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.Activities of daily livingCOVID-19Cognitive impairmentCritical careCritical illnessHealth-related quality of lifeOutcome assessmentPost-intensive care syndromePost-traumatic stress disorderSleepSurvivorsSurvivorshipPost-intensive care syndrome after a critical COVID-19: cohort study from a Belgian follow-up clinicJournal Article2022-08-11Fields of Research::32 - Biomedical and clinical sciences::3202 - Clinical sciences::320212 - Intensive careFields of Research::42 - Health sciences::4201 - Allied health and rehabilitation science::420109 - Rehabilitationhttp://doi.org/10.1186/s13613-021-00910-9