Comparisons between deterministic and probabilistic liquefaction assessment approaches

dc.contributor.author	Lacrosse, V.
dc.contributor.author	van Ballegooy, S.
dc.contributor.author	Bradley, Brendon
dc.date.accessioned	2016-09-15T04:13:02Z
dc.date.available	2016-09-15T04:13:02Z
dc.date.issued	2016	en
dc.description.abstract	Liquefaction assessments are commonly undertaken by geotechnical engineers using a deterministic approach. This approach does not appropriately take into account the significant uncertainties associated with a liquefaction assessment and can potentially compound the conservatism that is introduced when selecting input parameters. Therefore, the deterministic assessment approach can be conservative and the expected performance poorly understood. This research project looks at an alternative approach for liquefaction assessments – a probabilistic assessment. Other researchers have hypothetically experimented with the idea, but have never operationalised a probabilistic approach.	en
dc.identifier.uri	http://hdl.handle.net/10092/12738
dc.language.iso	en
dc.publisher	Quake CoRE	en
dc.rights	CC-BY 4.0 International	en
dc.rights.uri	https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode
dc.title	Comparisons between deterministic and probabilistic liquefaction assessment approaches	en
dc.type	Conference Contributions - Other

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1

Name:: POSTER - Lacrosse_ProbabilisticLiquefactionEvaluation_QCAM_2016_poster.pdf
Size:: 290.7 KB
Format:: Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1