Forecasting Fines for Health and Safety in Employment Offences in New Zealand (2013)

View/ Open
Type of Content
Discussion / Working PapersPublisher
University of Canterbury. Department of Economics and FinanceCollections
- Business: Working Papers [193]
- Working Papers in Economics [142]
Abstract
Sentences for employers convicted of offences under NZ health and safety law have been subject to constraints from two main sources (i) legislation; and (ii) guideline judgment cases. Their effect is to effectively split sentencing into three distinct time periods, viz., the period following the introduction of the De Spa Guidelines to the implementation of the Sentencing Act 2002, the second following the joint implementation of the Sentencing Act and the Health and Safety in Employment Amendment Act to the Hanham & Philp Guideline judgment in December 2008, and the third is the post Hanham & Philp Guideline period. This article builds on previous work that analyses the various factors relevant to HSE sentencing, concentrating on the second and third periods. Among other results, this work shows that for period 3, although harm continues to play an important role in explaining sentences of reparation, its previous role in directly explaining levels of fines is replaced by various levels of employer culpability. The Hanham & Philp decisions incorporated harm in determining culpability and District Court judges appear to follow this judgment closely in this respect. The present article illustrates forecasted sentences for periods 2 and 3, and, for the forecasts of period 3 penalties using second period weights, finds that fines would have been frequently lower, often substantially so, than those that occurred, consistent with the Hanham & Philp Guidelines. Reparations, however, are largely unaffected.
Citation
Woodfield, A., Hickson, S., Menclova A. (2013) Forecasting Fines for Health and Safety in Employment Offences in New Zealand..This citation is automatically generated and may be unreliable. Use as a guide only.
Keywords
Health & Safety offences; judicial guidelines; forecasting finesANZSRC Fields of Research
11 - Medical and Health Sciences::1117 - Public Health and Health Services::111705 - Environmental and Occupational Health and SafetyRelated items
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
-
Alignment of the Safety Assessment Method with New Zealand Legislative Responsibilities
Pons DJ (MDPI AG, 2019)Need—National legislative health and safety (H&S) frameworks impose requirements but grant self-management to organisations. Consequently variability arises in management systems, and some organisations struggle to ... -
An Empirical Analysis of Changing Guidelines for Health and Safety in Employment Sentences in New Zealand
Woodfield, A.; Hickson, S.; Menclova, A. (University of Canterbury. Department of Economics and Finance, 2013)Sentences for employers convicted of offences under NZ health and safety law have been subject to constraints from two main sources (i) legislation; and (ii) guideline judgment cases. Their effect is to effectively split ... -
Comprehensive clinical assessment of home-based older persons within New Zealand: an epidemiological profile of a national cross-section
Schluter PJ; Ahuriri-Driscoll A; Anderson TJ; Beere P; Brown J; Dalrymple-Alford J; David T; Davidson A; Gillon DA; Hirdes J; Keeling S; Kingham, Simon; Lacey C; Menclova AK; Millar N; Mor V; Jamieson HA (WILEY-BLACKWELL, 2016)© 2016 Public Health Association of Australia Objective: Since 2012, all community care recipients in New Zealand have undergone a standardised needs assessment using the Home Care International Residential Assessment ...