University of Canterbury Home
    • Admin
    UC Research Repository
    UC Library
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.
    View Item 
    1. UC Home
    2. Library
    3. UC Research Repository
    4. UC Business School | Te Kura Umanga
    5. Business: Working Papers
    6. View Item
    1. UC Home
    2.  > 
    3. Library
    4.  > 
    5. UC Research Repository
    6.  > 
    7. UC Business School | Te Kura Umanga
    8.  > 
    9. Business: Working Papers
    10.  > 
    11. View Item

    Ranking Journal Quality by Harmonic Mean of Ranks: An Application to ISI Statistics & Probability (2012)

    Thumbnail
    View/Open
    12646848_1211.pdf (747.8Kb)
    Type of Content
    Discussion / Working Papers
    UC Permalink
    http://hdl.handle.net/10092/9801
    
    Publisher
    University of Canterbury. Department of Economics and Finance
    Collections
    • Business: Working Papers [193]
    Authors
    McAleer, M.
    Chang, C.-L.
    show all
    Abstract

    As the preponderance of journal rankings becomes increasingly more frequent and prominent in academic decision making, such rankings in broad discipline categories is taking on an increasingly important role. The paper focuses on the robustness of rankings of academic journal quality and research impact using on the widely-used Thomson Reuters ISI Web of Science citations database (ISI) for the Statistics & Probability category. The paper analyses 110 ISI international journals in Statistics & Probability using quantifiable Research Assessment Measures (RAMs), and highlights the similarities and differences in various RAMs, which are based on alternative transformations of citations and influence. Alternative RAMs may be calculated annually or updated daily to determine When, Where and How (frequently) published papers are cited (see Chang et al. (2011a, b, c), Chang et al. (2012)). The RAMs are grouped in four distinct classes that include impact factor, mean citations and non-citations, journal policy, number of high quality papers, and journal influence and article influence. These classes include the most widely used RAMs, namely the classic 2-year impact factor including journal self-citations (2YIF), 2-year impact factor excluding journal self-citations (2YIF*), 5-year impact factor including journal self-citations (5YIF), Eigenfactor (or Journal Influence), Article Influence, h-index, PI-BETA (Papers Ignored - By Even The Authors), 5YD2 (= 5YIF/2YIF) as a measure of citations longevity, and Escalating Self Citations (ESC) as a measure of increasing journal self-citations. The paper highlights robust rankings based on the harmonic mean of the ranks of RAMs across the 4 classes. We show that focusing solely on the 2-year impact factor (2YIF) of a journal, which partly answers the question as to When published papers are cited, to the exclusion of other informative RAMs, which answer Where and How (frequently) published papers are cited, can distort the evaluation of journal quality, impact and influence, relative to the more robust harmonic mean of the ranks.

    Citation
    McAleer, M., Chang, C-L. (2012) Ranking Journal Quality by Harmonic Mean of Ranks: An Application to ISI Statistics & Probability..
    This citation is automatically generated and may be unreliable. Use as a guide only.
    Keywords
    Research assessment measures; impact factor; IFI; C3PO; PI-BETA; STAR; Eigenfactor; Article Influence; h-index; 5YD2; ESC; harmonic mean of the ranks; Statistics & Probability; robust journal rankings.
    ANZSRC Fields of Research
    01 - Mathematical Sciences::0104 - Statistics::010401 - Applied Statistics
    36 - Creative arts and writing::3602 - Creative and professional writing::360205 - Technical writing
    Rights
    https://hdl.handle.net/10092/17651

    Related items

    Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.

    • Robust Ranking of Journal Quality: An Application to Economics 

      Chang, C-L.; Maasoumi, E.; McAleer, M. (University of Canterbury. Department of Economics and Finance, 2012)
      The paper focuses on the robustness of rankings of academic journal quality and research impact in general, and in Economics, in particular, based on the widely-used Thomson Reuters ISI Web of Science citations database ...
    • What do Experts Know About Ranking Journal Quality? A Comparison with ISI Research Impact in Finance 

      Chang, C-L.; McAleer, M. (College of Business and EconomicsUniversity of Canterbury. Department of Economics and Finance, 2012)
      Experts possess knowledge and information that are not publicly available. The paper is concerned with the ranking of academic journal quality and research impact using a survey of experts from a national project on ranking ...
    • How Should Journal Quality be Ranked? An Application to Agricultural, Energy, Environmental and Resource Economics 

      Chang, C-L.; McAleer, M. (College of Business and EconomicsUniversity of Canterbury. Department of Economics and Finance, 2011)
      The Thomson Reuters ISI Web of Science citations database (hereafter ISI) category of Economics has one of the largest numbers of journals, at 304, of any ISI discipline, and hence has wide coverage. The paper analyses the ...
    Advanced Search

    Browse

    All of the RepositoryCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThesis DisciplineThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThesis Discipline

    Statistics

    View Usage Statistics
    • SUBMISSIONS
    • Research Outputs
    • UC Theses
    • CONTACTS
    • Send Feedback
    • +64 3 369 3853
    • ucresearchrepository@canterbury.ac.nz
    • ABOUT
    • UC Research Repository Guide
    • Copyright and Disclaimer
    • SUBMISSIONS
    • Research Outputs
    • UC Theses
    • CONTACTS
    • Send Feedback
    • +64 3 369 3853
    • ucresearchrepository@canterbury.ac.nz
    • ABOUT
    • UC Research Repository Guide
    • Copyright and Disclaimer