University of Canterbury Home
    • Admin
    UC Research Repository
    UC Library
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.
    View Item 
    1. UC Home
    2. Library
    3. UC Research Repository
    4. Faculty of Engineering | Te Kaupeka Pūhanga
    5. Engineering: Conference Contributions
    6. View Item
    1. UC Home
    2.  > 
    3. Library
    4.  > 
    5. UC Research Repository
    6.  > 
    7. Faculty of Engineering | Te Kaupeka Pūhanga
    8.  > 
    9. Engineering: Conference Contributions
    10.  > 
    11. View Item

    Comparing Pointing and Drawing for Remote Collaboration (2013)

    Thumbnail
    View/Open
    12648710_WIP_#121_Final.pdf (1.097Mb)
    Type of Content
    Conference Contributions - Published
    UC Permalink
    http://hdl.handle.net/10092/9178
    
    Publisher's DOI/URI
    https://doi.org/10.1109/ISMAR.2013.6671833
    
    Publisher
    University of Canterbury. Human Interface Technology Laboratory
    Collections
    • Engineering: Conference Contributions [2338]
    Authors
    Kim, S.
    Lee, G.
    Sakata, N.
    Vartiainen, E.
    Billinghurst, Mark cc
    show all
    Abstract

    In this research, we explore using pointing and drawing in a remote collaboration system. Our application allows a local user with a tablet to communicate with a remote expert on a desktop computer. We compared performance in four conditions: (1) Pointers on Still Image, (2) Pointers on Live Video, (3) Annotation on Still Image, and (4) Annotation on Live Video. We found that using drawing annotations would require fewer inputs on an expert side, and would require less cognitive load on the local worker side. In a follow-on study we compared the conditions (2) and (4) using a more complicated task. We found that pointing input requires good verbal communication to be effective and that drawing annotations need to be erased after completing each step of a task.

    Citation
    Kim, S., Lee, G., Sakata, N., Vartiainen, E., Billinghurst, M. (2013) Comparing Pointing and Drawing for Remote Collaboration. Adelaide, Australia: International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality (ISMAR), 1-4 Oct 2013. 1-6.
    This citation is automatically generated and may be unreliable. Use as a guide only.
    Keywords
    video conferencing; augmented reality
    ANZSRC Fields of Research
    10 - Technology::1005 - Communications Technologies::100509 - Video Communications
    08 - Information and Computing Sciences::0801 - Artificial Intelligence and Image Processing::080111 - Virtual Reality and Related Simulation
    Rights
    https://hdl.handle.net/10092/17651

    Related items

    Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.

    • Real-time Visual Representations for Mixed Reality Remote Collaboration 

      Gao L; Bai H; Piumsomboon T; Lee G; Lindeman RW; Billinghurst, Mark (2017)
      We present a prototype Mixed Reality (MR) system with a hybrid interface to support remote collaboration between a local worker and a remote expert in a large-scale work space. By combining a low-resolution 3D point-cloud ...
    • A Projected Augmented Reality System for Remote Collaboration 

      Tait, M.; Tsai, T.; Sakata, N.; Billinghurst, Mark; Vartiainen, E. (University of Canterbury. Electrical and Computer EngineeringUniversity of Canterbury. Human Interface Technology Laboratory, 2013)
      This paper describes an AR system for remote collaboration using a captured 3D model of the local user’s scene. In the system a remote user can manipulate the scene independently of the view of the local user and add ...
    • Study of Augmented Gesture Communication Cues and View Sharing in Remote Collaboration 

      Kim, S.; Lee, G.; Sakata, N.; Duenser, A.; Vartiainen, E.; Billinghurst, Mark (University of Canterbury. Human Interface Technology Laboratory, 2013)
      In this research, we explore how different types of augmented gesture communication cues can be used under different view sharing techniques in a remote collaboration system. In a pilot study, we compared four conditions: ...
    Advanced Search

    Browse

    All of the RepositoryCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThesis DisciplineThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThesis Discipline

    Statistics

    View Usage Statistics
    • SUBMISSIONS
    • Research Outputs
    • UC Theses
    • CONTACTS
    • Send Feedback
    • +64 3 369 3853
    • ucresearchrepository@canterbury.ac.nz
    • ABOUT
    • UC Research Repository Guide
    • Copyright and Disclaimer
    • SUBMISSIONS
    • Research Outputs
    • UC Theses
    • CONTACTS
    • Send Feedback
    • +64 3 369 3853
    • ucresearchrepository@canterbury.ac.nz
    • ABOUT
    • UC Research Repository Guide
    • Copyright and Disclaimer