Libya and the politics of the Responsibility to Protect (2012)
The Responsibility to Protect (RtoP) norm is usually framed in apolitical terms of civilian protection. This paper aims to challenge that depiction and demonstrate the deeply political nature of the RtoP, which is often elided or denied by its proponents. In order to achieve this, the paper will first look to the RtoP literature to demonstrate the depoliticisation of the norm, evident in the reference to the ‘international community’ or the ‘conscience of mankind’ as decisive factors in determining when the responsibility to protect has been breached and what should be done to rectify the situation. I will then turn to a case study of the 2011 NATO intervention in Libya. In this situation, the initial calls for intervention were premised upon the protection of civilian life against the murderous intent of the Gaddafi regime. The NATO action that followed the initial UN authorization, however, went far beyond the authority to protect civilians and strayed into the highly political realm of regime change, to the extent that the intervening forces became heavy participants in the forced displacement and massacre that occurred during the siege of Sirte. Taking sides, in this case, meant participating in violence against civilians of a similar nature to that which called forth the intervention in the first place. This example will be used to demonstrate the inevitable ‘fall’ into politics – and a profoundly ‘sovereign’ politics at that – that will accompany any physical attempt to protect civilians in the context of a civil war.
CitationMoses, J. (2012) Libya and the politics of the Responsibility to Protect. Sydney, Australia: Oceanic Conference on International Studies, 18-20 Jul 2012.
This citation is automatically generated and may be unreliable. Use as a guide only.
ANZSRC Fields of Research44 - Human society::4408 - Political science::440808 - International relations
18 - Law and Legal Studies::1801 - Law::180116 - International Law
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
Hemmings, A.D.; Gilbert, N. (University of Canterbury. Gateway Antarctica, 2015)
Richard Caplan, International Governance of War-Torn Territories: Rule and Reconstruction (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006),291 pp. Moses, J. (University of Canterbury. School of Language, Social and Political SciencesUniversity of Canterbury. Political Science and International Relations, 2008)With the limited acceptance of the ‘responsibility to protect’ at the 2005 UN World Summit, it appears that the exercise of humanitarian intervention – and the related peacekeeping and peacebuilding operations that follow ...
Hemmings, A.D. (University of Canterbury. Gateway Antarctica, 2016)The key Antarctic Treaty System (ATS) events of 2014 were the two annual diplomatic meetings, the Antarctic Treaty Consultative Meeting and the Meeting of the Commission for the Conservation of Antarctic Marine Living ...