Co-opting the Global Health Agenda: The Problematic Role of Partnerships and Foundations in Defining Priorities (2011)
Type of ContentChapters
University of Canterbury. Geography
EditorsO. Williams and S. Rushton
There is little dispute that the global health agenda is increasingly being shaped by foundations and partnerships, as the introduction to and rationale for this book make plain. In the wake of structural adjustment in the Global South, and in the context of the worldwide dominance of neoliberalism, new actors are addressing global health crises such as HIV/AIDS, malnutrition, and water-borne diseases (Farmer, 2005; WHO, 2008). This book examines the impact of these new global health actors on the wider system of global health governance. In this chapter, we argue that the mainstream global health agenda is being driven by powerful, wealthy, and generally market-oriented (and often corporate-funded) foundations as well as by new Global Health Partnerships (GHPs). Given the resources and political support these actors enjoy, they have become de facto agenda-setters and increasingly shape the trajectory of global health governance. Whilst such actors are investing resources on an unprecedented scale -- especially in combating specific diseases such as HIV, tuberculosis and malaria -- we argue here that they also have a tendency to bolster the same corporate, capitalist, neoliberal agenda that has been so deleterious to health outcomes across the globe (Harvey, 2003; Kim, 2000). Certainly they are not alone in this –much publicly-funded global and national health policy and spending is similarly underpinned by neoliberal ideology (Saith, 2006). Nevertheless, there is a need to further explore the implications of this ‘private turn’ in global health governance as these new actors remake the health agenda in specific ways.
CitationFaubion, C.T., Paige, S.B., Pearson, A.L. (2011) Co-opting the Global Health Agenda: The Problematic Role of Partnerships and Foundations in Defining Priorities. In O. Williams and S. Rushton (Ed.). Partnerships and Foundations in Global Health (pp. 1-25). London: Palgrave Macmillan.
This citation is automatically generated and may be unreliable. Use as a guide only.
ANZSRC Fields of Research11 - Medical and Health Sciences::1117 - Public Health and Health Services
16 - Studies in Human Society::1605 - Policy and Administration::160599 - Policy and Administration not elsewhere classified
RightsThis extract is taken from the author's original manuscript and has not been edited. The definitive version of this piece may be found in Partnerships and Foundations in Global Health Governance edited by Simon Rushton and Owain David Williams which can be accessed from www.palgrave.com
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
The approaches to measuring the potential spatial access to urban health services revisited: distance types and aggregation-error issues Gelb J; Apparicio P; Dube A-S; Kingham, Simon; Gauvin L; Robitaille E (2017)Background: The potential spatial access to urban health services is an important issue in health geography, spatial epidemiology and public health. Computing geographical accessibility measures for residential areas (e.g. ...
Winter Is Coming: A Socio-Environmental Monitoring and Spatiotemporal Modelling Approach for Better Understanding a Respiratory Disease Marek L; Campbell M; Epton M; Kingham S; Storer M (2018)Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease is a progressive lung disease affecting the respiratory function of every sixth New Zealander and over 300 million people worldwide. In this paper, we explored how the combination ...
Campbell MH; Marek L; Curl A; Kingham S (2017)