What Makes a Great Journal Great in the Sciences? Which Came First, the Chicken or the Egg? (2010)

View/ Open
Type of Content
Discussion / Working PapersPublisher
College of Business and EconomicsUniversity of Canterbury. Department of Economics and Finance
Collections
- Business: Working Papers [194]
- Working Papers in Economics [142]
Abstract
The paper is concerned with analysing what makes a great journal great in the sciences, based on quantifiable Research Assessment Measures (RAM). Alternative RAM are discussed, with an emphasis on the Thomson Reuters ISI Web of Science database (hereafter ISI). Various ISI RAM that are calculated annually or updated daily are defined and analysed, including the classic 2-year impact factor (2YIF), 5-year impact factor (5YIF), Immediacy (or zero-year impact factor (0YIF)), Eigenfactor, Article Influence, C3PO (Citation Performance Per Paper Online), h-index, Zinfluence, PI-BETA (Papers Ignored - By Even The Authors), Impact Factor Inflation (IFI), and three new RAM, namely Historical Self-citation Threshold Approval Rating (H-STAR), 2 Year Self-citation Threshold Approval Rating (2Y-STAR), and Cited Article Influence (CAI). The RAM data are analysed for the 6 most highly cited journals in 20 highly-varied and well-known ISI categories in the sciences, where the journals are chosen on the basis of 2YIF. The application to these 20 ISI categories could be used as a template for other ISI categories in the sciences and social sciences, and as a benchmark for newer journals in a range of ISI disciplines. In addition to evaluating the 6 most highly cited journals in each of 20 ISI categories, the paper also highlights the similarities and differences in alternative RAM, finds that several RAM capture similar performance characteristics for the most highly cited scientific journals, determines that PI-BETA is not highly correlated with the other RAM, and hence conveys additional information regarding research performance. In order to provide a meta analysis summary of the RAM, which are predominantly ratios, harmonic mean rankings are presented of the 13 RAM for the 6 most highly cited journals in each of the 20 ISI categories. It is shown that emphasizing THE impact factor, specifically the 2-year impact factor, of a journal to the exclusion of other informative RAM can lead to a distorted evaluation of journal performance and influence on different disciplines, especially in view of inflated journal self citations.
Citation
Chan, C., McAleer, M., Oxley, L. (2010) What Makes a Great Journal Great in the Sciences? Which Came First, the Chicken or the Egg?. Department of Economics and Finance. 35pp..This citation is automatically generated and may be unreliable. Use as a guide only.
Keywords
Research Assessment Measures (RAM); impact factors; Immediacy; Eigenfactor; Article Influence; Cited Article Influence; h-index; C3PO; Zinfluence; PI-BETA; IFI; H-STAR; 2Y-STARANZSRC Fields of Research
36 - Creative arts and writing::3602 - Creative and professional writing::360203 - Professional writing and journalism practice02 - Physical Sciences
03 - Chemical Sciences
06 - Biological Sciences
46 - Information and computing sciences::4610 - Library and information studies::461005 - Informetrics
Related items
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
-
What Makes a Great Journal Great in Economics? The Singer, not the Song
Chang, C-L.; McAleer, M.; Oxley, L. (College of Business and EconomicsUniversity of Canterbury. Department of Economics and Finance, 2010)The paper is concerned with analysing what makes a great journal great in economics, based on quantifiable measures. Alternative Research Assessment Measures (RAM) are discussed, with an emphasis on the Thomson Reuters ISI ... -
What do Experts Know About Ranking Journal Quality? A Comparison with ISI Research Impact in Finance
Chang, C-L.; McAleer, M. (College of Business and EconomicsUniversity of Canterbury. Department of Economics and Finance, 2012)Experts possess knowledge and information that are not publicly available. The paper is concerned with the ranking of academic journal quality and research impact using a survey of experts from a national project on ranking ... -
How Should Journal Quality be Ranked? An Application to Agricultural, Energy, Environmental and Resource Economics
Chang, C-L.; McAleer, M. (College of Business and EconomicsUniversity of Canterbury. Department of Economics and Finance, 2011)The Thomson Reuters ISI Web of Science citations database (hereafter ISI) category of Economics has one of the largest numbers of journals, at 304, of any ISI discipline, and hence has wide coverage. The paper analyses the ...