University of Canterbury Home
    • Admin
    UC Research Repository
    UC Library
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.
    View Item 
    1. UC Home
    2. Library
    3. UC Research Repository
    4. UC Business School | Te Kura Umanga
    5. Business: Working Papers
    6. View Item
    1. UC Home
    2.  > 
    3. Library
    4.  > 
    5. UC Research Repository
    6.  > 
    7. UC Business School | Te Kura Umanga
    8.  > 
    9. Business: Working Papers
    10.  > 
    11. View Item

    What Makes a Great Journal Great in the Sciences? Which Came First, the Chicken or the Egg? (2010)

    Thumbnail
    View/Open
    12632491_1075.pdf (287.6Kb)
    Type of Content
    Discussion / Working Papers
    UC Permalink
    http://hdl.handle.net/10092/6120
    
    Publisher
    College of Business and Economics
    University of Canterbury. Department of Economics and Finance
    Collections
    • Business: Working Papers [194]
    • Working Papers in Economics [142]
    Authors
    Chan, C.
    McAleer, M.
    Oxley, L.
    show all
    Abstract

    The paper is concerned with analysing what makes a great journal great in the sciences, based on quantifiable Research Assessment Measures (RAM). Alternative RAM are discussed, with an emphasis on the Thomson Reuters ISI Web of Science database (hereafter ISI). Various ISI RAM that are calculated annually or updated daily are defined and analysed, including the classic 2-year impact factor (2YIF), 5-year impact factor (5YIF), Immediacy (or zero-year impact factor (0YIF)), Eigenfactor, Article Influence, C3PO (Citation Performance Per Paper Online), h-index, Zinfluence, PI-BETA (Papers Ignored - By Even The Authors), Impact Factor Inflation (IFI), and three new RAM, namely Historical Self-citation Threshold Approval Rating (H-STAR), 2 Year Self-citation Threshold Approval Rating (2Y-STAR), and Cited Article Influence (CAI). The RAM data are analysed for the 6 most highly cited journals in 20 highly-varied and well-known ISI categories in the sciences, where the journals are chosen on the basis of 2YIF. The application to these 20 ISI categories could be used as a template for other ISI categories in the sciences and social sciences, and as a benchmark for newer journals in a range of ISI disciplines. In addition to evaluating the 6 most highly cited journals in each of 20 ISI categories, the paper also highlights the similarities and differences in alternative RAM, finds that several RAM capture similar performance characteristics for the most highly cited scientific journals, determines that PI-BETA is not highly correlated with the other RAM, and hence conveys additional information regarding research performance. In order to provide a meta analysis summary of the RAM, which are predominantly ratios, harmonic mean rankings are presented of the 13 RAM for the 6 most highly cited journals in each of the 20 ISI categories. It is shown that emphasizing THE impact factor, specifically the 2-year impact factor, of a journal to the exclusion of other informative RAM can lead to a distorted evaluation of journal performance and influence on different disciplines, especially in view of inflated journal self citations.

    Citation
    Chan, C., McAleer, M., Oxley, L. (2010) What Makes a Great Journal Great in the Sciences? Which Came First, the Chicken or the Egg?. Department of Economics and Finance. 35pp..
    This citation is automatically generated and may be unreliable. Use as a guide only.
    Keywords
    Research Assessment Measures (RAM); impact factors; Immediacy; Eigenfactor; Article Influence; Cited Article Influence; h-index; C3PO; Zinfluence; PI-BETA; IFI; H-STAR; 2Y-STAR
    ANZSRC Fields of Research
    36 - Creative arts and writing::3602 - Creative and professional writing::360203 - Professional writing and journalism practice
    02 - Physical Sciences
    03 - Chemical Sciences
    06 - Biological Sciences
    46 - Information and computing sciences::4610 - Library and information studies::461005 - Informetrics
    Rights
    https://hdl.handle.net/10092/17651

    Related items

    Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.

    • What Makes a Great Journal Great in Economics? The Singer, not the Song 

      Chang, C-L.; McAleer, M.; Oxley, L. (College of Business and EconomicsUniversity of Canterbury. Department of Economics and Finance, 2010)
      The paper is concerned with analysing what makes a great journal great in economics, based on quantifiable measures. Alternative Research Assessment Measures (RAM) are discussed, with an emphasis on the Thomson Reuters ISI ...
    • What do Experts Know About Ranking Journal Quality? A Comparison with ISI Research Impact in Finance 

      Chang, C-L.; McAleer, M. (College of Business and EconomicsUniversity of Canterbury. Department of Economics and Finance, 2012)
      Experts possess knowledge and information that are not publicly available. The paper is concerned with the ranking of academic journal quality and research impact using a survey of experts from a national project on ranking ...
    • How Should Journal Quality be Ranked? An Application to Agricultural, Energy, Environmental and Resource Economics 

      Chang, C-L.; McAleer, M. (College of Business and EconomicsUniversity of Canterbury. Department of Economics and Finance, 2011)
      The Thomson Reuters ISI Web of Science citations database (hereafter ISI) category of Economics has one of the largest numbers of journals, at 304, of any ISI discipline, and hence has wide coverage. The paper analyses the ...
    Advanced Search

    Browse

    All of the RepositoryCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThesis DisciplineThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThesis Discipline

    Statistics

    View Usage Statistics
    • SUBMISSIONS
    • Research Outputs
    • UC Theses
    • CONTACTS
    • Send Feedback
    • +64 3 369 3853
    • ucresearchrepository@canterbury.ac.nz
    • ABOUT
    • UC Research Repository Guide
    • Copyright and Disclaimer
    • SUBMISSIONS
    • Research Outputs
    • UC Theses
    • CONTACTS
    • Send Feedback
    • +64 3 369 3853
    • ucresearchrepository@canterbury.ac.nz
    • ABOUT
    • UC Research Repository Guide
    • Copyright and Disclaimer