• Admin
    UC Research Repository
    View Item 
       
    • UC Home
    • Library
    • UC Research Repository
    • College of Science
    • Science: Theses and Dissertations
    • View Item
       
    • UC Home
    • Library
    • UC Research Repository
    • College of Science
    • Science: Theses and Dissertations
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Browse

    All of the RepositoryCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

    Statistics

    View Usage Statistics

    Stealing the past: Disputed memories in twins

    Thumbnail
    View/Open
    sheen_thesis.pdf (5.920Mb)
    Author
    Sheen, Mercedes Kier
    Date
    2002
    Permanent Link
    http://hdl.handle.net/10092/4585
    Thesis Discipline
    Psychology
    Degree Grantor
    University of Canterbury
    Degree Level
    Doctoral
    Degree Name
    Doctor of Philosophy

    This thesis investigated a new false memory phenomenon: disputed memories, in which two people dispute ownership of a memory. For example, in one case two twins recalled being sent home from school for wearing too short a skirt although only one of them was actually sent home. The first study compared twins' ratings of disputed and non-disputed memories and found that disputed memories were rated significantly higher on a number of phenomenological properties thought to be central to recollection. Study 2 used the cue-word technique in an attempt to elicit disputed memories in a naturalistic way. Twenty sets of twins disputed a total of thirty-six events, twenty-one of which were only discovered to be in dispute during the study. In the third study non-twins were asked whether they had every experienced a disputed memory. The results suggest that they do but at a lower frequency than twins, with six of the sixty-nine participants reporting one disputed memory. Study 4 asked parents to provide brief descriptions of events from the lives of their twins to examine whether the participants would claim their co-twin's events as their own. The results suggest that they sometimes do, with two disputed memories reported from six sets of twins, but the method was somewhat unreliable as parents attributed some events to the incorrect twin. In Study 5 six sets of twins who took part in Study 1 were asked to re-rate their disputed and non-disputed memories after a two-year delay. The results suggested that disputed memories may have some quality that renders them less susceptible to decay over time as ratings for disputed memories on all of the scales remained relatively stable whilst ratings for non-disputed memories were significantly lower on re-test. Overall, results from the five studies suggest that disputed memories represent a new kind of confabulation that is relatively common amongst twins. A number of existing theories of autobiographical memory, such as source monitoring, unconscious plagiarism and imagination inflation, offer some insight as to what factors may be involved in their creation.

    Collections
    • Science: Theses and Dissertations [3449]
    Rights
    https://canterbury.libguides.com/rights/theses

    UC Research Repository
    University Library
    University of Canterbury
    Private Bag 4800
    Christchurch 8140

    Phone
    364 2987 ext 8718

    Email
    ucresearchrepository@canterbury.ac.nz

    Follow us
    FacebookTwitterYoutube

    © University of Canterbury Library
    Send Feedback | Contact Us