How linguistic structure influences and helps to predict metaphoric meaning (2013)
AuthorsDunn Jshow all
This paper argues that two properties of the linguistic structure of an utterance influence and partially determine whether the utterance has a metaphoric meaning that results in a stable interpretation: (i) degree of metaphoricity and (ii) degree of metaphoric saturation. A majority of metaphoric utterances in a corpus study (66%) were unsaturated, low metaphoricity utterances that behave as expected by Max Black and the cognitive linguistics paradigm. However, a significant minority (34%) of the metaphoric utterances were saturated or high metaphoricity utterances that behave partially as expected by Donald Davidson and others working in his tradition. This suggests that the direct and indirect interpretation views of metaphor are not incompatible but apply to different sub-groups of metaphoric utterances. The paper then constructs a model of metaphoric meaning that makes falsifiable predictions about the interpretations of metaphoric utterances in order to provide further evidence that unsaturated, low metaphoricity utterances have stable interpretations. This research provides both converging evidence for the cognitive linguistic view of metaphor and also a framework for limiting its scope to most, but not all, metaphoric utterances.
CitationDunn J (2013). How linguistic structure influences and helps to predict metaphoric meaning. Cognitive Linguistics. 24(1). 33-66.
This citation is automatically generated and may be unreliable. Use as a guide only.
Keywordsexistence of metaphoric meaning; linguistic properties of metaphoric utterances; predicting interpretations of metaphoric utterances; behavior of lexicalized meaning during forced metaphorization
ANZSRC Fields of Research20 - Language, Communication and Culture::2004 - Linguistics::200408 - Linguistic Structures (incl. Grammar, Phonology, Lexicon, Semantics)
20 - Language, Communication and Culture::2004 - Linguistics::200402 - Computational Linguistics
20 - Language, Communication and Culture::2003 - Language Studies::200322 - Comparative Language Studies
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
Dunn J (2013)This paper evaluates four metaphor identification systems on the 200,000 word VU Amsterdam Metaphor Corpus, comparing results by genre and by sub-class of metaphor. The paper then compares the rate of agreement between ...
Eke ki runga i te waka: the use of dominant metaphors by newly-fluent Māori speakers in historical perspective King, Jeanette Margaret (University of Canterbury. Maori and Indigenous Studies, 2007)In language revitalisation movements the main impetus and passion is often provided by adults who, as second language speakers, have gained fluency in their heritage language. As parents and teachers these adults often ...
Pointing, swaying, and walking towards tomorrow : the link between spatial metaphor and body movements in Mandarin and English Sun, Keyi (University of Canterbury, 2016)English and Mandarin use different linguistic metaphors to encode time. English uses the sagittal dimension (with the future as front as in looking forward), whereas Mandarin tends to use both the vertical (with future as ...