How linguistic structure influences and helps to predict metaphoric meaning (2013)

View/ Open
Type of Content
Journal ArticlePublisher
Walter de Gruyter GmbHISSN
0936-59071613-3641
Collections
- Arts: Journal Articles [316]
Abstract
This paper argues that two properties of the linguistic structure of an utterance influence and partially determine whether the utterance has a metaphoric meaning that results in a stable interpretation: (i) degree of metaphoricity and (ii) degree of metaphoric saturation. A majority of metaphoric utterances in a corpus study (66%) were unsaturated, low metaphoricity utterances that behave as expected by Max Black and the cognitive linguistics paradigm. However, a significant minority (34%) of the metaphoric utterances were saturated or high metaphoricity utterances that behave partially as expected by Donald Davidson and others working in his tradition. This suggests that the direct and indirect interpretation views of metaphor are not incompatible but apply to different sub-groups of metaphoric utterances. The paper then constructs a model of metaphoric meaning that makes falsifiable predictions about the interpretations of metaphoric utterances in order to provide further evidence that unsaturated, low metaphoricity utterances have stable interpretations. This research provides both converging evidence for the cognitive linguistic view of metaphor and also a framework for limiting its scope to most, but not all, metaphoric utterances.
Citation
Dunn J (2013). How linguistic structure influences and helps to predict metaphoric meaning. Cognitive Linguistics. 24(1). 33-66.This citation is automatically generated and may be unreliable. Use as a guide only.
Keywords
existence of metaphoric meaning; linguistic properties of metaphoric utterances; predicting interpretations of metaphoric utterances; behavior of lexicalized meaning during forced metaphorizationANZSRC Fields of Research
47 - Language, communication and culture::4704 - Linguistics::470409 - Linguistic structures (incl. phonology, morphology and syntax)20 - Language, Communication and Culture::2004 - Linguistics::200402 - Computational Linguistics
47 - Language, communication and culture::4703 - Language studies::470304 - Comparative language studies
Related items
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
-
Multi-unit association measures: Moving beyond pairs of words
Dunn J (2018)This paper formulates and evaluates a series of multi-unit measures of directional association, building on the pairwise ΔP measure, that are able to quantify association in sequences of varying length and type ... -
Learned Construction Grammars Converge Across Registers Given Increased Exposure
Tayyar Madabushi H; Dunn, Jonathan (Association for Computational Linguistics, 2021)This paper measures the impact of increased exposure on whether learned construction grammars converge onto shared representations when trained on data from different registers. Register influences the frequency of ... -
What Metaphor Identification Systems Can Tell Us About Metaphor-in-Language
Dunn J (2013)This paper evaluates four metaphor identification systems on the 200,000 word VU Amsterdam Metaphor Corpus, comparing results by genre and by sub-class of metaphor. The paper then compares the rate of agreement between ...