A case for resurrecting lost species. Review Essay of Beth Shapiro's, "How to Clone a Mammoth: The Science of De-extinction" (2016)
Type of ContentJournal Article
PublisherUniversity of Canterbury. School of Humanities and Creative Arts
University of Canterbury. Philosophy
- Arts: Journal Articles 
AuthorsCampbell, D.I.show all
The title of Beth Shapiro’s ‘How to Clone a Mammoth’ contains an implicature: it suggests that it is indeed possible to clone a mammoth, to bring extinct species back from the dead. But in fact Shapiro both denies this is possible, and denies there would be good reason to do it even if it were possible. The de-extinct ‘mammoths’ she speaks of are merely ecological proxies for mammoths—elephants re-engineered for cold-tolerance by the addition to their genomes of a few mammoth genes. Shapiro’s denial that genuine species de-extinction is possible is based on her assumption that the resurrected organisms would need to be perfectly indistinguishable from the creatures that died out. In this article I use the example of an extinct New Zealand wattlebird, the huia, to argue that there are compelling reasons to resurrect certain species if it can be done. I then argue that synthetically created organisms needn’t be perfectly indistinguishable from their genetic forebears in order for species de-extinction to be successful.
CitationCampbell, D.I. (2016) A case for resurrecting lost species. Review Essay of Beth Shapiro's, "How to Clone a Mammoth: The Science of De-extinction". Biology and Philosophy.
This citation is automatically generated and may be unreliable. Use as a guide only.
Keywordsde-extinction; species; authenticity; facilitated adaptation; huia
ANZSRC Fields of Research06 - Biological Sciences::0603 - Evolutionary Biology::060311 - Speciation and Extinction
22 - Philosophy and Religious Studies::2202 - History and Philosophy of Specific Fields::220206 - History and Philosophy of Science (incl. Non-historical Philosophy of Science)