Selecting Candidates for De-extinction and Resurrection: Mammoths, Lenin’s Tomb and Neo-Eurasianism (2017)
Type of ContentJournal Article
- Arts: Journal Articles 
My paper explores links between the human and animal candidates for resurrection and deextinction and focuses on the aspect of nationalist agenda in application to both species. I explore the intersection between the scientific and symbolic agendas in the resurrection and de-extinction discourse. I interpret the ideological underpinnings of the current developments in the woolly mammoth de-extinction in the Russian Federation in parallel to the theme of resurrection of historically-important personalities in contemporary Russian fiction of magical historicist bent. My particular focus is on the role of Neo- Eurasianist thinking in the choice of the candidates for resurrection and de-extinction, both animal and human. My conclusions are that both animal de-extinction and human resurrection futurity share a proleptic vision of ecological and geopolitical scenarios and that both create taxonomies and hierarchies privileging one kind of species over the other. Due to the constructed exclusivity of selected candidates among species and human groupings this futurity is both informed by and makes a contribution to the quasi-racialist discourse. De-extinction plays into political ideas about race, identity, nationality in a way that might not be suspected. While on the surface the mammoth deextinction drive appears to be part of the process to restore the ecosystem for the holistic benefit of fauna, flora and humans, the Neo-Eurasianist context gives the project a distinct symbolic meaning. The new mammoth hybrid becomes correlated to the construct of complementary-hybridised Eurasian ethnicities of Siberia.
CitationMondry H (2017). Selecting Candidates for De-extinction and Resurrection: Mammoths, Lenin’s Tomb and Neo-Eurasianism. Animal Studies Journal. 6(1). 12-39.
This citation is automatically generated and may be unreliable. Use as a guide only.
Keywordsnationalism; race; geopolitics; mammoth de-extinction
ANZSRC Fields of Research31 - Biological sciences::3109 - Zoology::310903 - Animal developmental and reproductive biology
31 - Biological sciences::3104 - Evolutionary biology::310412 - Speciation and extinction
16 - Studies in Human Society::1608 - Sociology::160803 - Race and Ethnic Relations
44 - Human society::4410 - Sociology::441007 - Sociology and social studies of science and technology
50 - Philosophy and religious studies::5001 - Applied ethics::500101 - Bioethics
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
On the Authenticity of De-extinct Organisms, and the Genesis Argument Campbell DI (2017)Are the methods of synthetic biology capable of recreating authentic living members of an extinct species? An analogy with the restoration of destroyed natural landscapes suggests not. The restored version of a natural ...
On the Authenticity of De-extinct Organisms, and the Genesis Argument Campbell, Douglas (2017)Are the methods of synthetic biology capable of recreating authentic living members of an extinct species? An analogy with the restoration of destroyed natural landscapes suggests not. e restored version of a natural ...
A case for resurrecting lost species. Review Essay of Beth Shapiro's, "How to Clone a Mammoth: The Science of De-extinction" Campbell, D.I. (University of Canterbury. School of Humanities and Creative ArtsUniversity of Canterbury. Philosophy, 2016)The title of Beth Shapiro’s ‘How to Clone a Mammoth’ contains an implicature: it suggests that it is indeed possible to clone a mammoth, to bring extinct species back from the dead. But in fact Shapiro both denies this ...