Identifying visual targets amongst interfering distractors: Sorting out the roles of perceptual load, dilution, and attentional zoom (2016)
Type of ContentJournal Article
PublisherUniversity of Canterbury. Psychology
Visual selection is imperfect; whenever a complex array of objects is processed, representations of multiple objects are likely to be active simultaneously. A full account of attentional processing must explain how these representations affect one another, and how they interact to produce a response. Evidence on these interactions comes from measures of distractor interference, and from dilution of distractor effects by other nontargets. Based on these data, different principles have been proposed to help understand target-distractor interactions, including accounts based on perceptual load and on dilution among nontargets. We review evidence from a number of experiments, including some using Yantis and Jonides’ (1984; 1990) methods for preventing abrupt onsets, which can disrupt spatial attention. The results underscore spatial constraints on the allocation of attention to include targets and exclude distractors. Selection is most effective when a single region can be selected that includes all possible target locations and excludes possible distractor locations. This region can be expanded or contracted as needed for the task, as suggested by Eriksen and St. James’ (1986) zoom lens model. This attentional zoom setting is probably affected by a number of factors, including the number of nontargets, the similarity among stimulus elements, the discriminability of the possible targets, and the discrimination difficulty of a concurrent task. A narrower attentional zoom setting that excludes a distractor will prevent interference from that distractor. Interference from a distractor will be diluted by nontargets, but only if they are within the attentional zoom region.
CitationCave, K.R., Chen, Z. (2016) Identifying visual targets amongst interfering distractors: Sorting out the roles of perceptual load, dilution, and attentional zoom. Attention, Perception & Psychophysics.
This citation is automatically generated and may be unreliable. Use as a guide only.
ANZSRC Fields of Research17 - Psychology and Cognitive Sciences::1702 - Cognitive Science::170201 - Computer Perception, Memory and Attention
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
Perceptual load vs. dilution: the role of attentional focus, stimulus category, and target predictability Chen, Z.; Cave, K. R. (University of Canterbury. Psychology, 2013)
Chen, Z.; Cave, K.R. (University of Canterbury. Psychology., 2006)What happens after visual attention is allocated to an object? Although many theories of attention assume that all of its features are selected and processed, there has been little direct evidence that an irrelevant feature ...
Constraints on dilution from a narrow attentional zoom reveal how spatial and color cues direct selection Chen, Z.; Cave, K.R. (University of Canterbury. Psychology, 2014)Distractor interference is subject to dilution from other nontarget elements, and the level of dilution is affected by attention. This study explores the nature of dilution when the location and color of the target is known ...
Chen, Z. (University of Canterbury. Psychology., 2008)Previous research has shown conflicting results regarding the effect of distractor eccentricity on selective attention. The present study examines the relationship between a distractor’s retinal location and participants’ ...
Perceptual or motor decoupling? An investigation into the genesis of errors in the Sustained Attention to Response Task Bedi, Aman (University of Canterbury, 2018)
Brock, Philip J (University of Canterbury, 2005)Target acquisition is a core part of modern computer use. Fitts’ law has frequently been proven to predict performance of target acquisition tasks; even with targets that change size as the cursor approaches. Research ...