Research Engagement after Disasters: Research Coordination Before, During, and after the 2010-2011 Canterbury Earthquake Sequence, New Zealand (2015)
Type of ContentJournal Article
PublisherUniversity of Canterbury. Geological Sciences
University of Canterbury. Vice-Chancellors Office
University of Canterbury. New Zealand Institute of Language, Brain & Behaviour
- Science: Journal Articles 
This article argues that active coordination of research engagement after disasters has the potential to maximize research opportunities, improve research quality, increase end-user engagement, and manage escalating research activity to mitigate ethical risks posed to impacted populations. The focus is on the coordination of research activity after the 22nd February 2011 Mw6.2 Christchurch earthquake by the then newly-formed national research consortium, the Natural Hazards Research Platform, which included a social science research moratorium during the declared state of national emergency. Decisions defining this organisation’s functional and structural parameters are analyzed to identify lessons concerning the need for systematic approaches to the management of post disaster research, in collaboration with the response effort. Other lessons include the importance of involving an existing, broadly-based research consortium, ensuring that this consortium's coordination role is fully integrated into emergency management structures, and ensuring that all aspects of decision-making processes are transparent and easily accessed.
CitationBeaven, S., Wilson, T.M., Johnston, L.C., Johnston, D.M., Smith, R.T. (2015) Research Engagement after Disasters: Research Coordination Before, During, and after the 2010-2011 Canterbury Earthquake Sequence, New Zealand. Earthquake Spectra.
This citation is automatically generated and may be unreliable. Use as a guide only.
ANZSRC Fields of Research44 - Human society::4407 - Policy and administration::440710 - Research, science and technology policy
44 - Human society::4410 - Sociology::441002 - Environmental sociology
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
Monitoring wellbeing during recovery from the 2010-2011 Canterbury earthquakes: the CERA Wellbeing Survey Morgan, J.; Begg, A.; Beaven, S.; Jamieson, K.; Johal, S.; Johnston, D.; Schluter, P.; Sparrow, M. (University of Canterbury. School of Health Sciences, 2015)In this paper we outline the process and outcomes of a multi-agency, multi-sector research collaboration, led by the Canterbury Earthquake Research Authority (CERA). The CERA Wellbeing Survey (CWS) is a serial, cross-sectional ...
Response to the policy question “How can innovation in the way we use information and emerging technologies help biodiversity thrive?” Heinemann, Jack (2021)The challenge is to identify solutions to problems, not just participate in a process that shifts harm and defers solutions. Our response is provided in the spirit of wanting to help to restore and sustain “the mauri ...
Community involvement in decision-making for the beneficial re-use of biosolids: biosolids case study final report. Client Report FW09086 Baker, V.; Ahuriri-Driscoll, A.; Foote, J.; Hepi, M.; Winstanley, A (University of Canterbury. Health Sciences Centre, 2009)