University of Canterbury Home
    • Admin
    UC Research Repository
    UC Library
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.
    View Item 
    1. UC Home
    2. Library
    3. UC Research Repository
    4. Faculty of Science | Te Kaupeka Pūtaiao
    5. Science: Theses and Dissertations
    6. View Item
    1. UC Home
    2.  > 
    3. Library
    4.  > 
    5. UC Research Repository
    6.  > 
    7. Faculty of Science | Te Kaupeka Pūtaiao
    8.  > 
    9. Science: Theses and Dissertations
    10.  > 
    11. View Item

    The impact of plan complexity on the accuracy of VMAT for the treatment of head and neck cancer (2015)

    Thumbnail
    View/Open
    Thesis_fulltext.pdf (1.645Mb)
    Satherley_T_Use_of_thesis_form_2015.pdf (84.59Kb)
    Type of Content
    Theses / Dissertations
    UC Permalink
    http://hdl.handle.net/10092/10584
    http://dx.doi.org/10.26021/8204
    
    Thesis Discipline
    Medical Physics
    Degree Name
    Master of Science
    Publisher
    University of Canterbury. Physics
    Collections
    • Science: Theses and Dissertations [4657]
    Authors
    Satherley, Thomas William Scott
    show all
    Abstract

    Purpose: At the Wellington Blood and Cancer Centre (WBCC), Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT) is used to treat a variety of head and neck (H&N) cancers. Presently, the complexity of plans is limited to ensure the accuracy of patient treatment within the range of the departmental experience. The complexity limitation is applied through use of a monitor unit (MU) constraint during plan optimisation. Plans of higher complexity can be obtained by loosening the MU constraint, and setting more stringent optimisation objectives on organs at risk (OAR) and target volumes (PTV). This could potentially yield higher quality treatment plans but may also degrade the accuracy of the TPS calculation or the plan delivery at the treatment machine. The aim of this study is to investigate the level of plan complexity that results in accurate treatment plan calculation and delivery, and quantify the corresponding gain in plan quality.

    Methods: Five previously treated H&N patients were selected for the study. Each patient’s clinical plan was used as the lowest complexity level and labelled C1. Subsequently, an approximate pareto-optimal plan (C3) was created that focused equally on sparing spinal cord, brain stem and parotid gland while maintaining, or improving on, the previously obtained target coverage. Next, a C2 plan was created such that the plan quality was in between C1 and C3. Plan quality of each complexity level was assessed in terms of OAR sparing and PTV coverage. The average leaf pair opening (LPO), critical leaf pair opening (%LPO<1cm) and mean leaf travel were used as plan complexity metrics. The calculation and delivery accuracy of each complexity level using Varian TrueBeam LINAC/Eclipse TPS was verified using time resolved point dose measurements (TRPD), EBT film measurements (Ashland Inc.) and ArcCheck measurements (Sun Nuclear Corp.). A comprehensive uncertainty analysis was carried out including a quantification of the measurement and delivery reproducibility.

    Results: Increasing plan complexity from C1 to C3 reduced the Spinal Cord D1cc, Brain Stem D1 and Parotid Gland Dmean up to 14.7 Gy, 7.1 Gy and 7.8 Gy, respectively. In addition, C3 plans improved the target coverage compared to C1 plans, with the PTV66 and PTV54 D98 increasing up to 1.0 Gy and 0.6 Gy, respectively. The verification measurements showed that the plan calculation and delivery for all complexity levels was well within clinical acceptance levels (Table 1). TRPD showed that VMAT dose delivery itself was repeatable within 0.1% (1 S.D.) over 10 consecutive deliveries for both C1 and C3 complexity levels.

    Discussion & Conclusions: This study has shown that increasing the plan complexity can provide significant dosimetric advantages for the treatment of H&N cancer. Verification measurement results indicated that this did not noticeably degrade the calculation and delivery accuracy of VMAT using a Varian TrueBeam LINAC and our Eclipse TPS beam model. H&N VMAT at the WBCC can now be developed further with greater confidence in the dosimetric accuracy of higher complexity plans.

    Keywords
    medical physics; VMAT; plan complexity; radiotherapy; volumetric arc therapy; head and neck cancer; cancer
    Rights
    Copyright Thomas William Scott Satherley
    https://canterbury.libguides.com/rights/theses

    Related items

    Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.

    • Ototoxicity in patients receiving concurrent cisplatin and cranial irradiation therapy for the treatment of head and neck cancers: an audiometric follow-up 

      Alchin, Katrine Felice (University of Canterbury. Communication Disorders, 2010)
      Cisplatin is a potent chemotherapeutic agent that is commonly used to treat a wide variety of tumours. Although highly effective, its administration is complicated by its ototoxic effect, a well known side effect that ...
    • Validation of Deformable Image Registration for Head & Neck Cancer Adaptive Radiotherapy 

      Ramadaan, Ihab Safa (University of Canterbury. Physics and Astronomy, 2013)
      Anatomical changes can have significant clinical impact during head and neck radiotherapy. Adaptive radiotherapy (ART) may be applied to account for such changes. Implementation of ART to alter dose delivery requires ...
    • Monte Carlo Investigation into Superficial Cancer Treatments of the Head and Neck 

      Currie, Bryn Edward (University of Canterbury. Physics and Astronomy, 2007)
      This thesis presents the findings of the investigation into the Monte Carlo simulation of superficial cancer treatments of the head and neck region. The EGSnrc system of codes for the Monte Carlo simulation of the transport ...
    Advanced Search

    Browse

    All of the RepositoryCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThesis DisciplineThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThesis Discipline

    Statistics

    View Usage Statistics
    • SUBMISSIONS
    • Research Outputs
    • UC Theses
    • CONTACTS
    • Send Feedback
    • +64 3 369 3853
    • ucresearchrepository@canterbury.ac.nz
    • ABOUT
    • UC Research Repository Guide
    • Copyright and Disclaimer
    • SUBMISSIONS
    • Research Outputs
    • UC Theses
    • CONTACTS
    • Send Feedback
    • +64 3 369 3853
    • ucresearchrepository@canterbury.ac.nz
    • ABOUT
    • UC Research Repository Guide
    • Copyright and Disclaimer