Unified ethical principles and an animal research ‘Helsinki’ declaration as foundations for international collaboration (2022)
Ethical frameworks are the foundation for any research with humans or nonhuman animals. Human research is guided by overarching international ethical principles, such as those defined in the Helsinki Declaration by the World Medical Association. However, for nonhuman animal research, because there are several sets of ethical principles and national frameworks, it is commonly thought that there is substantial variability in animal research approaches internationally and a lack of an animal research ‘Helsinki Declaration’, or the basis for one. We first overview several prominent sets of ethical principles, including the 3Rs, 3Ss, 3Vs, 4Fs and 6Ps. Then using the 3Rs principles, originally proposed by Russell & Burch, we critically assess them, asking if they can be Replaced, Reduced or Refined. We find that the 3Rs principles have survived several replacement challenges, and the different sets of principles (3Ss, 3Vs, 4Fs and 6Ps) are complementary, a natural refinement of the 3Rs and are ripe for integration into a unified set of principles, as proposed here. We also overview international frameworks and documents, many of which incorporate the 3Rs, including the Basel Declaration on animal research. Finally, we propose that the available animal research guidance documents across countries can be consolidated, to provide a similar structure as seen in the Helsinki Declaration, potentially as part of an amended Basel Declaration on animal research. In summary, we observe substantially greater agreement on and the possibility for unification of the sets of ethical principles and documents that can guide animal research internationally.
CitationPetkov CI, Flecknell P, Murphy K, Basso MA, Mitchell AS, Hartig R, Thompson-Iritani S (2022). Unified ethical principles and an animal research ‘Helsinki’ declaration as foundations for international collaboration. Current Research in Neurobiology. 3. 100060-100060.
This citation is automatically generated and may be unreliable. Use as a guide only.
Keywords3Rs; 3Ss; 3Vs; 4Fs; 6Ps; ethics; bioethics; regulation; morality; AAALAC; harm-benefit-analysis
ANZSRC Fields of Research50 - Philosophy and religious studies::5001 - Applied ethics::500101 - Bioethics
RightsAll rights reserved unless otherwise stated
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
International primate neuroscience research regulation, public engagement and transparency opportunities Hartig R; Basso MA; Jarrett W; Kastner S; Poirier C; Mitchell, Anna S (Elsevier BV, 2021)Scientific excellence is a necessity for progress in biomedical research. As research becomes ever more international, establishing international collaborations will be key to advancing our scientific knowledge. Understanding ...
Probyn-Rapsey, F.; Donaldson, S.; Ioannides, G.; Lea, T.; Marsh, K.; Neimanis, A.; Potts, A.; Taylor, Nik; Twine, R.; Wadiwel, D.; White, S. (2016)Under the remit of an expanded definition of sustainability – one that acknowledges animal agriculture as a key carbon intensive industry, and one that includes interspecies ethics as an integral part of social justice ...
Campbell DI (2017)Are the methods of synthetic biology capable of recreating authentic living members of an extinct species? An analogy with the restoration of destroyed natural landscapes suggests not. The restored version of a natural ...