A modular framework for the development of multi-hazard, multi-phase volcanic eruption scenario suites (2022)

Type of Content
Journal ArticlePublisher
Elsevier BVISSN
0377-0273Language
enCollections
- Science: Journal Articles [1156]
Abstract
Understanding future volcanic eruptions and their potential impact is a critical component of disaster risk reduction, and necessitates the production of salient, robust hazard information for decision-makers and endusers. Volcanic eruptions are inherently multi-phase, multi-hazard events, and the uncertainty and complexity surrounding potential future hazard behaviour is exceedingly hard to communicate to decision-makers. Volcanic eruption scenarios are recognised to be an effective knowledge-sharing mechanism between scientists and practitioners, and recent hybrid scenario suites partially address the limitations surrounding the traditional deterministic scenario approach. Despite advances in scenario suite development, there is still a gap in the international knowledge base concerning the synthesis of multi-phase, multi-hazard volcano science and end-user needs. In this study we present a new modular framework for the development of complex, long-duration, multiphase, multi-hazard volcanic eruption scenario suites. The framework was developed in collaboration with volcanic risk management agencies and researchers in Aotearoa-New Zealand, and is applied to Taranaki Mounga volcano, an area of high volcanic risk. This collaborative process aimed to meet end-user requirements, as well as the need for scientific rigour. This new scenario framework development process could be applied at other volcanic settings to produce robust, credible and relevant scenario suites that are demonstrative of the complex, varying-duration and multi-hazard nature of volcanic eruptions. In addressing this gap, the value of volcanic scenario development is enhanced by advancing multi-hazard assessment capabilities and cross-sector collaboration between scientists and practitioners for disaster risk reduction planning.
Citation
Weir AM, Mead S, Bebbington MS, Wilson TM, Beaven S, Gordon T, Campbell-Smart C (2022). A modular framework for the development of multi-hazard, multi-phase volcanic eruption scenario suites. Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research. 427. 107557-107557.This citation is automatically generated and may be unreliable. Use as a guide only.
Keywords
Dynamic risk; Multi-phase scenario; Emergency management; Disaster risk reduction; Mt Taranaki; New ZealandANZSRC Fields of Research
37 - Earth sciences::3705 - Geology::370512 - Volcanology46 - Information and computing sciences::4609 - Information systems::460903 - Information modelling, management and ontologies
35 - Commerce, management, tourism and services::3507 - Strategy, management and organisational behaviour::350703 - Disaster and emergency management
Rights
All rights reserved unless otherwise statedRelated items
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
-
Quantitying the Systemic Vulnerability of Critical Infrastructure Networks to Volcanic Multi-Hazards at Mt Taranaki, New Zealand
Weir, Alana; Wilson, Thomas; Bebbington, Mark; Deligne, Natalia (2019)Critical infrastructure are the infrastructural networks and systems deemed essential for the functionality of society and economy. Critical infrastructure systems are globally recognised to be highly interdependent, meaning ... -
Safety does not take a holiday: Towards real-time indicators of population exposure for disaster risk assessments
Darling, Mathew; Wilson, Thomas; Orchiston, Caroline; Adams, Benjamin; Bradley, Brendon (2020) -
Probabilistic volcanic impact assessment and cost-benefit analysis on network infrastructure for secondary evacuation of farm livestock: A case study from the dairy industry, Taranaki, New Zealand
Wild AJ; Wilson TM; Bebbington MS; Cole JW; Craig HM (Elsevier BV, 2019)Evacuation is often a necessary volcanic risk mitigation measure . However, the focus is typically on primary evacuation from immediate life safety from the eruption, compared to secondary evacuation from loss of critical ...