The Eightfold Way: Why Analyticity, Apriority and Necessity are Independent (2017)
Type of ContentJournal Article
- Arts: Journal Articles 
This paper concerns the three great modal dichotomies: (i) the necessary/contingent dichotomy; (ii) the a priori/empirical dichotomy; and (iii) the analytic/synthetic dichotomy. These can be combined to produce a tri-dichotomy of eight modal categories. The question as to which of the eight categories house statements and which do not is a pivotal battleground in the history of analytic philosophy, with key protagonists including Descartes, Hume, Kant, Kripke, Putnam and Kaplan. All parties to the debate have accepted that some categories are void. This paper defends the contrary view that all eight categories house statements—a position I dub ‘octopropositionalism’. Examples of statements belonging to all eight categories are given.
CitationCampbell DI (2017). The Eightfold Way: Why Analyticity, Apriority and Necessity are Independent. Philosophers' Imprint. 17(25). 1-17.
This citation is automatically generated and may be unreliable. Use as a guide only.
ANZSRC Fields of Research50 - Philosophy and religious studies::5003 - Philosophy
RightsAll rights reserved unless otherwise stated
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
On the Authenticity of De-extinct Organisms, and the Genesis Argument Campbell, Douglas (2017)Are the methods of synthetic biology capable of recreating authentic living members of an extinct species? An analogy with the restoration of destroyed natural landscapes suggests not. e restored version of a natural ...
Does the solar system compute the laws of motion? Yang Y; Campbell, Douglas (Springer Science and Business Media LLC, 2021)The counterfactual account of physical computation is simple and, for the most part, very attractive. However, it is usually thought to trivialize the notion of physical computation insofar as it implies ‘limited ...
Against Lewis on ‘Desire as Belief’ Campbell DI (2017)David Lewis describes, then attempts to refute, a simple anti-Humean theory of desire he calls ‘Desire as Belief’. Lewis’ critics generally accept that his argument is sound and focus instead on trying to show that its ...