University of Canterbury Home
    • Admin
    UC Research Repository
    UC Library
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.
    View Item 
    1. UC Home
    2. Library
    3. UC Research Repository
    4. Faculty of Engineering | Te Kaupeka Pūhanga
    5. Engineering: Journal Articles
    6. View Item
    1. UC Home
    2.  > 
    3. Library
    4.  > 
    5. UC Research Repository
    6.  > 
    7. Faculty of Engineering | Te Kaupeka Pūhanga
    8.  > 
    9. Engineering: Journal Articles
    10.  > 
    11. View Item

    Model-based PEEP titration versus standard practice in mechanical ventilation: A randomised controlled trial (2020)

    Thumbnail
    View/Open
    Model-based PEEP titration versus standard practice in mechanical ventilation a randomised controlled trial.pdf (1.111Mb)
    Type of Content
    Journal Article
    UC Permalink
    https://hdl.handle.net/10092/102041
    
    Publisher's DOI/URI
    http://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-019-4035-7
    
    Publisher
    Springer Science and Business Media LLC
    ISSN
    1745-6215
    Language
    eng
    Collections
    • Engineering: Journal Articles [1636]
    Authors
    Kim KT
    Morton S
    Howe S
    Chiew YS
    Desaive T
    Benyo B
    Szlavecz A
    Moeller K
    Shaw, Geoff cc
    Knopp, Jennifer cc
    Docherty, Paul cc
    Pretty, Christopher cc
    Chase, Geoff cc
    show all
    Alternative Title
    Model based PEEP titration versus standard practice in mechanical ventilation: A randomised controlled trial
    Abstract

    Background: Positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) at minimum respiratory elastance during mechanical ventilation (MV) in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) may improve patient care and outcome. The Clinical utilisation of respiratory elastance (CURE) trial is a two-arm, randomised controlled trial (RCT) investigating the performance of PEEP selected at an objective, model-based minimal respiratory system elastance in patients with ARDS. Methods and design: The CURE RCT compares two groups of patients requiring invasive MV with a partial pressure of arterial oxygen/fraction of inspired oxygen (PaO2/FiO2) ratio ≤ 200; one criterion of the Berlin consensus definition of moderate (≤ 200) or severe (≤ 100) ARDS. All patients are ventilated using pressure controlled (bi-level) ventilation with tidal volume = 6-8 ml/kg. Patients randomised to the control group will have PEEP selected per standard practice (SPV). Patients randomised to the intervention will have PEEP selected based on a minimal elastance using a model-based computerised method. The CURE RCT is a single-centre trial in the intensive care unit (ICU) of Christchurch hospital, New Zealand, with a target sample size of 320 patients over a maximum of 3 years. The primary outcome is the area under the curve (AUC) ratio of arterial blood oxygenation to the fraction of inspired oxygen over time. Secondary outcomes include length of time of MV, ventilator-free days (VFD) up to 28 days, ICU and hospital length of stay, AUC of oxygen saturation (SpO )/FiO during MV, number of desaturation events (SpO < 88%), changes in respiratory mechanics and chest x-ray index scores, rescue therapies (prone positioning, nitric oxide use, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation) and hospital and 90-day mortality. Discussion: The CURE RCT is the first trial comparing significant clinical outcomes in patients with ARDS in whom PEEP is selected at minimum elastance using an objective model-based method able to quantify and consider both inter-patient and intra-patient variability. CURE aims to demonstrate the hypothesized benefit of patient-specific PEEP and attest to the significance of real-time monitoring and decision-support for MV in the critical care environment. Trial registration: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trial Registry, ACTRN12614001069640. Registered on 22 September 2014. (https://www.anzctr.org.au/Trial/Registration/TrialReview.aspx?id=366838&isReview=true) The CURE RCT clinical protocol and data usage has been granted by the New Zealand South Regional Ethics Committee (Reference number: 14/STH/132). 2 2 2

    Citation
    Kim KT, Morton S, Howe S, Chiew YS, Knopp JL, Docherty P, Pretty C, Desaive T, Benyo B, Szlavecz A, Moeller K, Shaw GM, Chase JG (2020). Model-based PEEP titration versus standard practice in mechanical ventilation: A randomised controlled trial. Trials. 21(1). 130-.
    This citation is automatically generated and may be unreliable. Use as a guide only.
    Keywords
    Respiratory System; Humans; Respiratory Distress Syndrome, Adult; Oxygen; Breath Tests; Respiration, Artificial; Positive-Pressure Respiration; Oxygen Consumption; Computer-Aided Design; Middle Aged; Female; Male; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Clinical Trials, Phase II as Topic; Ventilator-Induced Lung Injury; Outcome Assessment, Health Care; ARDS; mechanical ventilation; pulmonary mechanics; RCT; PEEP titration
    ANZSRC Fields of Research
    32 - Biomedical and clinical sciences::3202 - Clinical sciences::320212 - Intensive care
    32 - Biomedical and clinical sciences::3201 - Cardiovascular medicine and haematology::320103 - Respiratory diseases
    40 - Engineering::4003 - Biomedical engineering::400306 - Computational physiology
    Rights
    All rights reserved unless otherwise stated
    http://hdl.handle.net/10092/17651

    Related items

    Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.

    • Respiratory system elastance monitoring during PEEP titration 

      Chiew, Y.S.; Chase, Geoff; Shaw, Geoff; Desaive, T. (University of Canterbury. Mechanical Engineering, 2012)
    • Safe doubling of ventilator capacity: A last resort proposal for last resorts 

      Chiew YS; Lambermont B; Morimont P; Shaw, Geoff; Desaive T; Chase, Geoff (Springer Science and Business Media LLC, 2020)
    • Why yesterday's care is now not good enough - an engineered approach to mechanical ventilation (Model-based elastance and optimal peep selection) 

      Shaw, Geoff; Chiew, Y.S.; Chase, Geoff; Sundaresan, A.; Desaive, T. (University of Canterbury. Mechanical Engineering, 2013)
    Advanced Search

    Browse

    All of the RepositoryCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThesis DisciplineThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThesis Discipline

    Statistics

    View Usage Statistics
    • SUBMISSIONS
    • Research Outputs
    • UC Theses
    • CONTACTS
    • Send Feedback
    • +64 3 369 3853
    • ucresearchrepository@canterbury.ac.nz
    • ABOUT
    • UC Research Repository Guide
    • Copyright and Disclaimer
    • SUBMISSIONS
    • Research Outputs
    • UC Theses
    • CONTACTS
    • Send Feedback
    • +64 3 369 3853
    • ucresearchrepository@canterbury.ac.nz
    • ABOUT
    • UC Research Repository Guide
    • Copyright and Disclaimer