University of Canterbury Home
    • Admin
    UC Research Repository
    UC Library
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.
    View Item 
    1. UC Home
    2. Library
    3. UC Research Repository
    4. Faculty of Engineering | Te Kaupeka Pūhanga
    5. Engineering: Journal Articles
    6. View Item
    1. UC Home
    2.  > 
    3. Library
    4.  > 
    5. UC Research Repository
    6.  > 
    7. Faculty of Engineering | Te Kaupeka Pūhanga
    8.  > 
    9. Engineering: Journal Articles
    10.  > 
    11. View Item

    Virtual Patient Modeling and Prediction Validation for Pressure Controlled Mechanical Ventilation (2020)

    Thumbnail
    View/Open
    Published version (776.7Kb)
    Type of Content
    Journal Article
    UC Permalink
    https://hdl.handle.net/10092/101898
    
    Publisher's DOI/URI
    http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifacol.2020.12.615
    
    Publisher
    Elsevier BV
    ISSN
    2405-8963
    Language
    en
    Collections
    • Engineering: Journal Articles [1635]
    Authors
    Morton SE
    Knopp JL
    Tawhai MH
    Docherty P
    Moeller K
    Heines SJ
    Bergmans DC
    Chase, Geoff cc
    show all
    Abstract

    Abstract: Respiratory failure patients in the intensive care unit (ICU) require mechanical ventilation (MV) to support breathing and tissue oxygenation. Optimizing MV care is problematic. Significant patient variability confounds optimal MV settings and increase the risk of lung damage due to excessive pressure or volume delivery, which in turn can increase length of stay and cost, as well as mortality. Model-based care using in silico virtual patients can significantly affect ICU care, personalizing delivery and optimising care. This research presents a virtual patient model for pressure-controlled MV, an increasingly common mode of MV delivery, based on prior work applied to volume-controlled MV. This change necessitates predictions of flow and thus volume, instead of pressure, as the unspecified variable. A model is developed and validated using clinical data from five patients (N=5) during a series of PEEP (positive end expiratory pressure) changes in a recruitment maneuver (RM), creating a total of 242 predictions. Peak inspiratory volume, a measure of risk of lung damage, errors were 56 [26-9]ml. (10.6[5.3-19.1]%) for predictions of PEEP changes from 2-16cmlH@), Model fitting errors were all lower than 5%. Accurate predictions validate the model, and its potential to both personalise and optimise care.

    Citation
    Morton SE, Knopp JL, Tawhai MH, Docherty P, Moeller K, Heines SJ, Bergmans DC, Chase JG (2020). Virtual Patient Modeling and Prediction Validation for Pressure Controlled Mechanical Ventilation. IFAC-PapersOnLine. 53(2). 16221-16226.
    This citation is automatically generated and may be unreliable. Use as a guide only.
    ANZSRC Fields of Research
    40 - Engineering::4003 - Biomedical engineering::400303 - Biomechanical engineering
    49 - Mathematical sciences::4901 - Applied mathematics::490102 - Biological mathematics
    32 - Biomedical and clinical sciences::3201 - Cardiovascular medicine and haematology::320103 - Respiratory diseases
    Rights
    All rights reserved unless otherwise stated
    http://hdl.handle.net/10092/17651

    Related items

    Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.

    • Development of Virtual Patients for Use in Mechanical Ventilation 

      Morton SE; Knopp JL; Shaw, Geoff; Chase, Geoff (2019)
    • Authors’ Response to Drs. Ece Salihoglu and Ziya Salihoglu’s Letter to the Editor 

      Morton SE; Möller K; Shaw, Geoff; Tawhai M; Knopp, Jennifer; Chase, Geoff; Docherty, Paul (Springer Science and Business Media LLC, 2020)
    • Model-based PEEP titration versus standard practice in mechanical ventilation: A randomised controlled trial 

      Kim KT; Morton S; Howe S; Chiew YS; Desaive T; Benyo B; Szlavecz A; Moeller K; Shaw, Geoff; Knopp, Jennifer; Docherty, Paul; Pretty, Christopher; Chase, Geoff (Springer Science and Business Media LLC, 2020)
      Background: Positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) at minimum respiratory elastance during mechanical ventilation (MV) in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) may improve patient care and outcome. The ...
    Advanced Search

    Browse

    All of the RepositoryCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThesis DisciplineThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThesis Discipline

    Statistics

    View Usage Statistics
    • SUBMISSIONS
    • Research Outputs
    • UC Theses
    • CONTACTS
    • Send Feedback
    • +64 3 369 3853
    • ucresearchrepository@canterbury.ac.nz
    • ABOUT
    • UC Research Repository Guide
    • Copyright and Disclaimer
    • SUBMISSIONS
    • Research Outputs
    • UC Theses
    • CONTACTS
    • Send Feedback
    • +64 3 369 3853
    • ucresearchrepository@canterbury.ac.nz
    • ABOUT
    • UC Research Repository Guide
    • Copyright and Disclaimer