Unpacking the efficacy of Reading to Learn using Cognitive Load Theory (2020)
This paper synthesises the key findings of past separate studies conducted by the same authors, which sought to assess the efficacy of the Reading to Learn (RtL) literacy intervention on students' academic writing performance. Both studies of RtL were implemented in response to growing concerns about the academic under-preparedness of undergraduate students at universities across South Africa. The first study aimed to support mostly first-generation, first-year English Additional Language (EAL) learners in their transition to higher education. The second study aimed to support EAL students' academic writing development at a senior secondary school level prior to the school-to-university transition. In both studies, the cohorts of students examined originated from low socioeconomic communities, where linguistic marginalisation arguably imposes significant barriers to successful university completion. The novel contribution of this paper is to use a Cognitive Load Theoretical lens to explicate why RtL might improve the academic writing skills of under-prepared students making the transition to university.
CitationMillin T, Mark M, Pearce J (2020). Unpacking the efficacy of Reading to Learn using Cognitive Load Theory. Journal of Academic Language and Learning. 14(1). 113-126.
This citation is automatically generated and may be unreliable. Use as a guide only.
Keywordsacademic literacy; scaffolding; Cognitive Load Theory; instructional design; equity
ANZSRC Fields of Research39 - Education::3901 - Curriculum and pedagogy::390104 - English and literacy curriculum and pedagogy (excl. LOTE, ESL and TESOL)
39 - Education::3904 - Specialist studies in education::390409 - Learning sciences
47 - Language, communication and culture::4704 - Linguistics::470401 - Applied linguistics and educational linguistics
39 - Education::3901 - Curriculum and pedagogy::390108 - LOTE, ESL and TESOL curriculum and pedagogy
RightsAll rights reserved unless otherwise stated
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
A better start literacy approach: effectiveness of Tier 1 and Tier 2 support within a response to teaching framework Gillon, Gail; McNeill, Brigid; Scott, Amy; Arrow, Alison; Gath, Megan; Macfarlane, Angus (Springer Science and Business Media LLC, 2022)The Better Start Literacy Approach (BSLA) is a strengths-based approach to supporting children’s literacy learning in their first year of school. Previous research has shown the approach is effective at accelerating ...
Impacting Change in Classroom Literacy Instruction: A Further Investigation of the Better Start Literacy Approach Gillon G; McNeill B; Gath M; Scott, Amy (Springer Science and Business Media LLC, 2022)Abstract</jats:title><jats:p>A controlled intervention study supported the effectiveness of teachers implementing an integrated intervention (<jats:italic>Better Start Literacy Approach; BSLA</jats:italic>) to accelerate ...
Leadership action for promoting reading (Paper 1) in Symposium "The Principals as Literacy Leaders (PALL) Story". Townsend T; Dempster N; Johnson G; Bayetto A; Lovett S (2018)Principals as Literacy Leaders project (PALL) was initiated in 2009 by the Australian Primary Principals Association (APPA) for schools in four states of Australia. It was funded by the Australian Government as part of its ...