University of Canterbury Home
    • Admin
    UC Research Repository
    UC Library
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.
    View Item 
    1. UC Home
    2. Library
    3. UC Research Repository
    4. Faculty of Education | Te Kaupeka Ako
    5. Education: Journal Articles
    6. View Item
    1. UC Home
    2.  > 
    3. Library
    4.  > 
    5. UC Research Repository
    6.  > 
    7. Faculty of Education | Te Kaupeka Ako
    8.  > 
    9. Education: Journal Articles
    10.  > 
    11. View Item

    Unpacking the efficacy of Reading to Learn using Cognitive Load Theory (2020)

    Thumbnail
    View/Open
    Published version (4.167Mb)
    Type of Content
    Journal Article
    UC Permalink
    https://hdl.handle.net/10092/101619
    
    ISSN
    1835-5196
    Collections
    • Education: Journal Articles [243]
    Authors
    Millin T
    Mark M
    Pearce J
    show all
    Abstract

    This paper synthesises the key findings of past separate studies conducted by the same authors, which sought to assess the efficacy of the Reading to Learn (RtL) literacy intervention on students' academic writing performance. Both studies of RtL were implemented in response to growing concerns about the academic under-preparedness of undergraduate students at universities across South Africa. The first study aimed to support mostly first-generation, first-year English Additional Language (EAL) learners in their transition to higher education. The second study aimed to support EAL students' academic writing development at a senior secondary school level prior to the school-to-university transition. In both studies, the cohorts of students examined originated from low socioeconomic communities, where linguistic marginalisation arguably imposes significant barriers to successful university completion. The novel contribution of this paper is to use a Cognitive Load Theoretical lens to explicate why RtL might improve the academic writing skills of under-prepared students making the transition to university.

    Citation
    Millin T, Mark M, Pearce J (2020). Unpacking the efficacy of Reading to Learn using Cognitive Load Theory. Journal of Academic Language and Learning. 14(1). 113-126.
    This citation is automatically generated and may be unreliable. Use as a guide only.
    Keywords
    academic literacy; scaffolding; Cognitive Load Theory; instructional design; equity
    ANZSRC Fields of Research
    39 - Education::3901 - Curriculum and pedagogy::390104 - English and literacy curriculum and pedagogy (excl. LOTE, ESL and TESOL)
    39 - Education::3904 - Specialist studies in education::390409 - Learning sciences
    47 - Language, communication and culture::4704 - Linguistics::470401 - Applied linguistics and educational linguistics
    39 - Education::3901 - Curriculum and pedagogy::390108 - LOTE, ESL and TESOL curriculum and pedagogy
    Rights
    All rights reserved unless otherwise stated
    http://hdl.handle.net/10092/17651

    Related items

    Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.

    • Impacting Change in Classroom Literacy Instruction: A Further Investigation of the Better Start Literacy Approach 

      Gillon G; McNeill B; Gath M; Scott, Amy (Springer Science and Business Media LLC, 2022)
      Abstract</jats:title><jats:p>A controlled intervention study supported the effectiveness of teachers implementing an integrated intervention (<jats:italic>Better Start Literacy Approach; BSLA</jats:italic>) to accelerate ...
    • Self-esteem, self-efficacy, and resilience in children with literacy learning difficulties in English 

      Denston A; Everatt J; Taleni T (2019)
    • Longitudinal evaluation of the speech and literacy profile of children with inconsistent speech errors 

      McNeill, B.C.; Gillon, G.T. (University of Canterbury. College Office (Education, Health and Human Development)University of Canterbury. New Zealand Institute of Language, Brain & BehaviourUniversity of Canterbury. School of Teacher Education, 2014)
    Advanced Search

    Browse

    All of the RepositoryCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThesis DisciplineThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThesis Discipline

    Statistics

    View Usage Statistics
    • SUBMISSIONS
    • Research Outputs
    • UC Theses
    • CONTACTS
    • Send Feedback
    • +64 3 369 3853
    • ucresearchrepository@canterbury.ac.nz
    • ABOUT
    • UC Research Repository Guide
    • Copyright and Disclaimer
    • SUBMISSIONS
    • Research Outputs
    • UC Theses
    • CONTACTS
    • Send Feedback
    • +64 3 369 3853
    • ucresearchrepository@canterbury.ac.nz
    • ABOUT
    • UC Research Repository Guide
    • Copyright and Disclaimer