The Dynamic Evolution of International Environmental Law (2018)
This paper1 will explore selected innovations within MEAs that have contributed to the dynamic evolution of international environmental law within the context of the traditional rules relating to treaties, international institutions and state responsibility. It will argue that whilst these innovations undoubtedly push and develop the boundaries of these areas of law, they do not represent a significant departure from the traditional principle of consent that underpins international law more generally. But should they? The period of modern international environmental law (from 1972 to date), which from a lawyer’s perspective might be described as dynamic and innovative, has simultaneously witnessed significant and persistent environmental change and degradation across the biosphere, atmosphere and hydrosphere. We have already exceeded safe operating limits or planetary boundaries in respect of three of the nine areas of concern2 and the extent to which humankind has become an ecological force in its own right has led some scientists to herald a new geological epoch: the Anthropocene.3 The question for twenty-first century environmental lawyers is whether international environmental law is fit for the Anthropocene and whether there is sufficient scope for future dynamic evolution within the constraints and structures of the existing international legal system.
CitationScott KN (2018). The Dynamic Evolution of International Environmental Law. Victoria University of Wellington Law Review. 49. 607-625.
This citation is automatically generated and may be unreliable. Use as a guide only.
ANZSRC Fields of Research48 - Law and legal studies::4802 - Environmental and resources law::480203 - Environmental law
RightsAll rights reserved unless otherwise stated
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
The IIRC's 2013 International Integrated Reporting Framework: An evolution in sustainability reporting or a captured process? Van Staden, C.; Wild, S. (University of Canterbury. Department of Accounting and Information Systems, 2015)
Norman, Maki (University of Canterbury, 2016)Coastal lagoons are dynamic environments that are sensitive to climate change, sea level rise and anthropogenic activities, including the use of catchment water resources and land. Their management is of high public and ...
Turner, Leighton Andrew (University of Canterbury, 2015)Bacterial genomes comprise an assortment of cooperative and self-interested replicating entities (replicons). The ecology of these replicating entities most likely determines the short-term evolution of bacterial genomes. ...
Donovan, Katherine Aleisha (University of Canterbury, 2015)The molecular mechanisms that underpin adaptive evolution are not well understood. This is largely because few studies relate evolved alleles (genotype) with their physiological changes (phenotype), which move a population ...
Turnbull, Jane (University of Canterbury. Geography, 2005)Focusing on coral reef policy, this thesis challenges orthodox understanding of international environmental policy, studying environmental crises as political assemblies, and policy endeavours as power-filled networks. ...
Conflation of, and Conflict Between, Regulatory Mandates: Managing the Fragmentation of International Environmental Law in a Globalised World Scott, Karen N. (University of Canterbury. School of Law, 2010)The concepts of globalisation and fragmentation present both challenges and opportunities for international environmental governance. They are, nevertheless, contradictory concepts. On the one hand globalisation emphasises ...