Attitudes towards censorship of political movements in the United States of America: #AllLivesMatter and #BlackLivesMatter. (2020)
Type of ContentTheses / Dissertations
Degree NameMaster of Arts
PublisherUniversity of Canterbury
American politics is divisive (like many political systems worldwide now), and there are calls for censorship and de-platforming which are arguably anti-democratic. On the other hand, there are some rather unprincipled political actors who are perhaps not entirely honest, so one could legitimately argue for censorship in some cases. The present work aimed to examine psychological biases which influence support of censorship of another person; specifically, either a BLM or ALM-supporting protester. Using an experimental design with two Mechanical Turk samples (Study 1 N = 294; Study 2 N = 428), the study finds support for the hypotheses that when people have an opposing view to a protester, they are more likely to believe the protester has an ulterior motive, think they are giving a political signal, have a negative perceptions of the protester, and think sharing their view would be harmful, thus increasing support of censorship. These results support and add to the current literature of censorship and collective activism.
RightsAll Rights Reserved
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
Karl, Annabelle (University of Canterbury, 2018)The aim of this thesis is to investigate Millennial consumers’ intentions, perceptions, and attitudes toward sustainably produced New Zealand wine. This research direction was informed by a thematic literature review which ...
COVID-19 and its impact on Indigenous Community Resilience and Schooling in New Zealand, The United Stated of America and Canada: Some Recurring Messages for Consideration and Discussion Henderson T; Martin J; Whiteman L; Reyhner J; Steeves L; Manning, Richard (2021)