<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>UC Research Repository Collection:</title>
    <link>http://hdl.handle.net/10092/3489</link>
    <description />
    <pubDate>Tue, 16 Apr 2013 18:42:41 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:date>2013-04-16T18:42:41Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Developing challenging young people: Honouring their authentic story</title>
      <link>http://hdl.handle.net/10092/5977</link>
      <description>Title: Developing challenging young people: Honouring their authentic story
Authors: Jansen, C.; Pawson, P.
Editors: A. Pryor, C. Carpenter, C. Norton and J. Kirchner
Abstract: Worldwide, a multitude of adventure-based outdoor programmes exist that are designed to develop 'challenging' young people. Recently, Aotearoa/ New Zealand has seen a resurgence of interest from central government in implementing programmes for such young people that draw on military models of practise. The philosophy and format of adventure therapy programmes implemented by St John of God Waipuna in Otautahi/Christchurch Aotearoa/ New Zealand present a strong contrast to these military-style programmes. Evaluation of these programmes suggests that if adventure-based programmes are to be effective in developing young people and sustaining change, they must focus on developing all aspects of the young person.&#xD;
This approach is grounded in building respectful and meaningful relationships among everyone involved with the programme, and that approach, in turn, is predicated on power sharing and taking responsibility for oneself. The over-arching aim is to give young people a sense of ownership. This is achieved by an intentional shift throughout the programme from dependence, through independence and on to interdependence. The paper interweaves consideration of these aspects, especially in terms of how they have informed the design and delivery of the Waipuna programmes, with various models of personal development and leadership, along with the self-reported narrative of a young person involved in one of these programmes.</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 01 Jan 2011 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://hdl.handle.net/10092/5977</guid>
      <dc:date>2011-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The PBRF: Some Risks of Research Rankings</title>
      <link>http://hdl.handle.net/10092/4732</link>
      <description>Title: The PBRF: Some Risks of Research Rankings
Authors: Small, D.
Abstract: While the PBRF round and the associated funding is helping to recognise and increase the status of research, it also runs the risks of promoting the amount rather than the quality of research, moving further away from academic collegiality and towards corporate models of management, and allowing some universities to prosper at the expense of others. It also devalues other aspects of university scholarship to the potential cost of students.</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 01 Jan 2005 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://hdl.handle.net/10092/4732</guid>
      <dc:date>2005-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

