<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel rdf:about="http://hdl.handle.net/10092/567">
    <title>UC Research Repository Collection:</title>
    <link>http://hdl.handle.net/10092/567</link>
    <description />
    <items>
      <rdf:Seq>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://hdl.handle.net/10092/4532" />
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://hdl.handle.net/10092/3298" />
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://hdl.handle.net/10092/736" />
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://hdl.handle.net/10092/698" />
      </rdf:Seq>
    </items>
    <dc:date>2013-04-16T18:15:10Z</dc:date>
  </channel>
  <item rdf:about="http://hdl.handle.net/10092/4532">
    <title>"Can’t talk now, mate": New Zealand news media and the invisible Afghan war</title>
    <link>http://hdl.handle.net/10092/4532</link>
    <description>Title: "Can’t talk now, mate": New Zealand news media and the invisible Afghan war
Authors: Matheson, D.
Editors: R. Keeble and J. Mair</description>
    <dc:date>2010-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://hdl.handle.net/10092/3298">
    <title>Queer, Queerer, Queerest? Feminisms, Heterosexualities and Queer Theory</title>
    <link>http://hdl.handle.net/10092/3298</link>
    <description>Title: Queer, Queerer, Queerest? Feminisms, Heterosexualities and Queer Theory
Authors: Du Plessis, R.
Editors: Alice, L.; Star, L.</description>
    <dc:date>2004-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://hdl.handle.net/10092/736">
    <title>"The Heart That Cannot Bear...the Other": Reading Mengzi on the Goodness of Human Nature</title>
    <link>http://hdl.handle.net/10092/736</link>
    <description>Title: "The Heart That Cannot Bear...the Other": Reading Mengzi on the Goodness of Human Nature
Authors: Wu, X.
Editors: Santangelo, P.; Middendorf, U.
Abstract: This paper will discuss the ancient Chinese thinker Mengzi’s 孟子 (ca. 390-ca. 305&#xD;
B.C.) thought of human nature. But let us first quote from an increasingly influential&#xD;
modern French thinker: Emmanuel Levinas. The purpose of this citation is two-fold:&#xD;
on the one hand, it is an attempt to form a potentially constructive dialogue between&#xD;
what we will say about Mengzi in this paper and what Levinas has said about man as&#xD;
being inescapably responsible for the other; on the other hand, this citation should&#xD;
also serve to situate our discussion in wider philosophical contexts. We hope thus we&#xD;
may be able, at least in an implicit manner, to bring closer two thoughts or two&#xD;
intellectual traditions, viz., Chinese and European, and also to show how Mengzi’s&#xD;
thought of human nature, as it is read and interpreted in this paper, can go beyond&#xD;
the borders of Chinese thought and language, and take on more universal significance.</description>
    <dc:date>2006-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://hdl.handle.net/10092/698">
    <title>Truth in a War Zone: The Role of Warblogs in Iraq</title>
    <link>http://hdl.handle.net/10092/698</link>
    <description>Title: Truth in a War Zone: The Role of Warblogs in Iraq
Authors: Matheson, D.; Allan, S.
Editors: Maltby, S. and Keeble, R.
Abstract: This chapter proposes to examine the emergent forms and practices of&#xD;
blogging as an augmentation of – and at times challenge to – war reporting. As&#xD;
will soon become apparent, however, we have not attempted the difficult task of&#xD;
comprehensively surveying the multiplicity of warblogs concerned with the&#xD;
invasion and its aftermath. Rather, we have chosen to investigate a small&#xD;
number, grouping them into three broad categories: warblogs associated with&#xD;
major news organizations; warblogs produced by freelance or ‘sojo’ reporters,&#xD;
as well as ‘personal’ or ‘amateur’ journalists; and warblogs posted by Iraqi&#xD;
citizens. In the course of our analysis, we draw upon insights provided by&#xD;
bloggers themselves, both from interviews conducted by ourselves as well as&#xD;
from other sources. We suggest that these writers valued the use of blogging as&#xD;
journalism – characterized as it is by informality, subjectivity and eyewitness&#xD;
experience – for the ways in which it cuts across the fundamentals of ostensibly&#xD;
impartial news reporting. In this chapter’s evaluation of warblogging’s relative&#xD;
strengths and limitations, then, care will be taken to discern the extent to which&#xD;
it represents a challenge to certain longstanding tenets of war reporting.</description>
    <dc:date>2007-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </item>
</rdf:RDF>

