<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <title>UC Research Repository Collection:</title>
  <link rel="alternate" href="http://hdl.handle.net/10092/569" />
  <subtitle />
  <id>http://hdl.handle.net/10092/569</id>
  <updated>2013-05-15T11:02:47Z</updated>
  <dc:date>2013-05-15T11:02:47Z</dc:date>
  <entry>
    <title>Author Meets Critics: A panel discussion of Jennifer Germon's 'Gender: A Genealogy of an Idea' (Palgrave Macmillan, 2009) held at the Sociological Association of Aotearoa/New Zealand, Victoria University of Wellington, 9 December 2011</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://hdl.handle.net/10092/7717" />
    <author>
      <name>Cooper, A.</name>
    </author>
    <author>
      <name>Shaw, R.</name>
    </author>
    <author>
      <name>Beres, M.</name>
    </author>
    <author>
      <name>du Plessis, R.</name>
    </author>
    <author>
      <name>Germon, J.</name>
    </author>
    <id>http://hdl.handle.net/10092/7717</id>
    <updated>2013-05-14T12:30:08Z</updated>
    <published>2012-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
    <summary type="text">Title: Author Meets Critics: A panel discussion of Jennifer Germon's 'Gender: A Genealogy of an Idea' (Palgrave Macmillan, 2009) held at the Sociological Association of Aotearoa/New Zealand, Victoria University of Wellington, 9 December 2011
Authors: Cooper, A.; Shaw, R.; Beres, M.; du Plessis, R.; Germon, J.
Abstract: Panel discussion of Jennifer Germon's Gender: A Geneology of an Idea which includes critical analysis from Annabel Cooper, Rhonda Shaw, Melanie Beres and Rosemary Du Plessis. Jennifer Germon responds to the comments of the panel of critics. Each commentary is presented separately.</summary>
    <dc:date>2012-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Language specific markedness: The case of place of articulation</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://hdl.handle.net/10092/6994" />
    <author>
      <name>Hume, E.</name>
    </author>
    <id>http://hdl.handle.net/10092/6994</id>
    <updated>2012-09-10T12:30:07Z</updated>
    <published>2003-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
    <summary type="text">Title: Language specific markedness: The case of place of articulation
Authors: Hume, E.
Abstract: In&#xD;
this paper I draw on evidence from familiar criteria&#xD;
for diagnosing markedness values to argue that&#xD;
markedness is best determined on a language specific&#xD;
basis. I will further conclude that markedness&#xD;
considerations do not provide compelling evidence&#xD;
for constructing theories of phonological grammar.</summary>
    <dc:date>2003-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>The Traitor and the Hedonist: Motherhood in two New Zealand child abuse cases</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://hdl.handle.net/10092/6389" />
    <author>
      <name>Kenix, L.J.</name>
    </author>
    <id>http://hdl.handle.net/10092/6389</id>
    <updated>2012-03-12T11:30:15Z</updated>
    <published>2011-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
    <summary type="text">Title: The Traitor and the Hedonist: Motherhood in two New Zealand child abuse cases
Authors: Kenix, L.J.
Abstract: Two recent child abuse cases in New Zealand flooded the local media spotlight and captured the public’s attention. In both cases, the mothers were not charged with murdering their children. Yet, both mothers received extensive scrutiny in media coverage. This qualitative analysis found two central narratives in media content: that of the traitor and of the hedonist. In drawing upon such archetypal mythologies surrounding motherhood, the media constructed these women as simplistic deviants who did not possess the qualities of a mother. These framing techniques served to divert scrutiny away from civil society and exonerated social institutions of any potential wrongdoing while also reaffirming a persistent mythology that remains damaging to women.</summary>
    <dc:date>2011-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>'Having those conversations': the politics of risk in peer support practice</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://hdl.handle.net/10092/5909" />
    <author>
      <name>Scott, A.</name>
    </author>
    <author>
      <name>Doughty, C.</name>
    </author>
    <author>
      <name>Kahi, H.</name>
    </author>
    <id>http://hdl.handle.net/10092/5909</id>
    <updated>2011-12-07T11:30:26Z</updated>
    <published>2011-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
    <summary type="text">Title: 'Having those conversations': the politics of risk in peer support practice
Authors: Scott, A.; Doughty, C.; Kahi, H.
Abstract: Peer support is a fast growing type of service provision within the mental health sector. This study draws on interviews with peer supporters and peer support managers to explore the ways that risks of violence, suicide and self-harm are managed within peer support settings in Aotearoa New Zealand. Drawing on Nikolas Rose and other theorists, who define risk thinking as an attempt to ‘discipline uncertainty’, we argue that the philosophy of peer support is in tension with a ‘risk consciousness’ because it sees crisis as a learning opportunity. We contend that peer supporters are pulled towards the ‘risk consciousness’ which pervades the mental health sector, and that they address this by managing risk in various ways. Finally, we show that peer supporters challenge this risk consciousness by working with risk through a philosophy of engagement and relationship. As peer support becomes more integrated into the wider health system, the challenge will be to continue the development of risk practices which work within a strong peer support philosophy.</summary>
    <dc:date>2011-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
</feed>

